Michael Mmoh and Tristan Boyer will play each other in the quarter of the Stanford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.22
Tristan Boyer -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Tristan Boyer
There is no head to head record between Michael Mmoh and Tristan Boyer since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, Mmoh got to the quarter after beating Mitchell Krueger 6-2 6-3 and Dalibor Svrcina 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Michael had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (6-4 6-3). During the match, Mmoh scored 69 points vs Svrcina’s 53. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mmoh struck 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 66% of his first serves in, winning 64% (25/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Mmoh broke Svrcina 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michael hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
Mmoh has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (268-188). 13-8 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mmoh has a compiled 167-111 record in the last years on hard.
Michael has a compiled 16-12 win-loss record in 2023, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Michael has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Boyer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-29 | 15-12 | 27-15 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-23 | 15-11 | 18-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-2 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-12 | 11-8 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 492, Boyer got to the quarter after beating Anders Matta 6-3 6-0, Colin Markes 6-1 6-3, Bradley Klahn 6-3 7-62 and Sho Shimabukuro 7-5 7-68.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Shimabukuro (7-5 7-68). During the match Boyer scored 79 points vs Shimabukuro’s 75. Tristan was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Boyer fired 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tristan Boyer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Boyer put 67% of his first serves in, winning 69% (37/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Shimabukuro 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Boyer started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Boyer’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Savannah Challenger.
Tristan has a compiled 24-15 win-loss record in 2023, 12-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 78 |
| Pts | 124-92 | 265-193 |
| Total Points | 216 | 458 |
| Winners | 51 | 113 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Mmoh played 2 matches while Boyer competed in 4 matches. Boyer started his run from the qualifications while Mmoh had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Mmoh has played 4 set(s) less than Boyer (4 vs 8). Therefore, Mmoh played 42 games less than Boyer. The American scored 51 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Tristan bagged 113 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 71/103 | 144/216 |
| %1st in | 69% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 51/71 | 113/144 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 43/72 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Mmoh recorded 15 aces (7.5 per match). Boyer fired 21 aces (5.3 per match). Mmoh won 72% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Boyer won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 14 |
| Converted | 10/16 | 14/24 |
| % Converted | 63% | 58% |
| Conceded | 11 | 7 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 73% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Tristan broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | ||||
| R1 Krueger |
R2 Svrcina |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 | 36 | |
| pts | 55-39 | 69-53 | 124-92 | |
| Total points | 94 | 122 | 216 | |
| Winners | 26 | 25 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 36% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/44 | 39/59 | 71/103 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 66% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 25/39 | 51/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 64% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 10/20 | 16/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/10 | 10/16 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 60% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 73% | 37% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Boyer | ||||||
| Q1 Matta |
Q3 Markes |
R1 Klahn |
R2 Shimabukuro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 7-62 | 7-5 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 | 22 | 25 | 78 | |
| pts | 54-28 | 61-38 | 71-52 | 79-75 | 265-193 | |
| Total points | 82 | 99 | 123 | 154 | 458 | |
| Winners | 23 | 22 | 31 | 37 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% | 44% | 47% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 25/37 | 26/42 | 39/56 | 54/81 | 144/216 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 62% | 70% | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 22/26 | 31/39 | 37/54 | 113/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 85% | 79% | 69% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 10/16 | 11/17 | 13/27 | 43/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 63% | 65% | 48% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/11 | 2/3 | 4/5 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 36% | 67% | 80% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLW
WWWWWLLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
