Omni Kumar and Blaise Bicknell will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Winnipeg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Omni Kumar who should win in 3 sets.
Omni Kumar -> 1.7
Blaise Bicknell -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Omni Kumar vs. Blaise Bicknell
There is no head to head record between Omni Kumar and Blaise Bicknell since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Omni Kumar
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-9 | 8-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 382 (career-high), Omni reached the qualifications after beating Marko Stakusic 6-3 7-63.
In the qualifications, Kumar had a good straight sets win against Stakusic (6-3 7-63). During the match, Kumar scored 77 points vs Stakusic’s 62. The American was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kumar recorded 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Omni Kumar was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Stakusic 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Kumar has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (210-121). 35-22 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kumar has a composed206-112 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Kumar’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Los Angeles.
Kumar has a compiled 35-22 win-loss record in 2023, 35-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Omni has never competed in this tournament before.
Blaise Bicknell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 9-14 | 6-7 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-16 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-22 | 13-10 | 15-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-9 | 8-6 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 568, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Osgar O’Hoisin 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Bicknell had a good straight sets win against O’Hoisin (6-2 6-4). During the match Bicknell scored 62 points vs O’Hoisin’s 41. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Bicknell recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Blaise Bicknell was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (25/33) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Bicknell broke O’Hoisin 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Blaise’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 San Diego and M25 Laval.
Bicknell has an overall 18-4 win-loss record in 2023, 15-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kumar | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
Pts | 77-62 | 62-41 |
Total Points | 139 | 103 |
Winners | 30 | 25 |
%Winners | 39% | 40% |
Both Kumar and Bicknell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kumar and Bicknell have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kumar played 4 games more than Bicknell. Kumar scored 30 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 25 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kumar | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 4 |
Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
1st in | 40/65 | 33/49 |
%1st in | 62% | 67% |
1st pts | 30/40 | 25/33 |
%1st pts | 75% | 76% |
2nd pts | 14/25 | 10/16 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 63% |
Kumar blasted 3 aces . Bicknell scored 4 aces . Kumar won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Bicknell won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kumar | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/8 |
% Converted | 43% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 1 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 60% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Omni surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Bicknell broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Blaise conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Kumar | |||
Q1 Stakusic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 77-62 | 77-62 | |
Total points | 139 | 139 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Bicknell | |||
Q1 O’Hoisin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 62-41 | 62-41 | |
Total points | 103 | 103 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matija PecoticPecotic – Darian KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Andrew FentyFenty (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taha BaadiBaadi – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – Tatsuma ItoIto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (3-0) – H2H and prediction