Samuel Vincent Ruggeri and Julian Ocleppo will square off in the qualifications of the Todi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Julian Ocleppo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Julian Ocleppo is the pick to win this match.
Julian Ocleppo -> 1.57
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 2.29
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Samuel Vincent Ruggeri vs. Julian Ocleppo
There is no head to head record between Samuel Vincent Ruggeri and Julian Ocleppo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-32 | 12-6 | 26-20 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 378, Samuel reached the qualifications after beating Sebastian Dominko 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Samuel had a good straight sets win against Dominko (6-3 6-1). During the match, Vincent Ruggeri scored 57 points vs Dominko’s 38. Vincent Ruggeri was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vincent Ruggeri scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri was pretty efficient on serve to win 82% (18/22) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Samuel broke Dominko 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Vincent Ruggeri has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (125-74). 18-11 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vincent Ruggeri has a compiled59-38 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Cattolica and M25 Padova.
Vincent Ruggeri has an overall 33-22 win-loss record in 2023, 18-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Todi Challenger
Julian Ocleppo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-6 | 2-1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-18 | 3-2 | 32-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-6 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 442, Ocleppo got to the qualifications after defeating Federico Iannaccone 6-1 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Julian defeated Iannaccone (6-1 4-6 6-3). During the match Ocleppo scored 96 points vs Iannaccone’s 81. The Italian was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Ocleppo wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Julian Ocleppo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ocleppo put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (13/34) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Iannaccone 7 times after converting 70% of his break points (7/10).
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula,M25 Reggio Emilia and M15 Frascati.
The Italian has a composed 32-14 win-loss record in 2023, 30-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Todi Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vincent Ruggeri | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 26 |
| Pts | 57-38 | 96-81 |
| Total Points | 95 | 177 |
| Winners | 18 | 40 |
| %Winners | 32% | 42% |
Both Vincent Ruggeri and Ocleppo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Julian Ocleppo lost 1 set while Samuel Vincent Ruggeri hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Vincent Ruggeri has played 1 set(s) less than Ocleppo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Vincent Ruggeri played 10 games less than Ocleppo. Vincent Ruggeri scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Ocleppo scored 40 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vincent Ruggeri | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 22/44 | 59/93 |
| %1st in | 50% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 40/59 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 13/34 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 38% |
Vincent Ruggeri scored 1 ace . Ocleppo didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Vincent Ruggeri won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Ocleppo won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vincent Ruggeri | Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 7/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 70% |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Samuel broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Vincent Ruggeri pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Ocleppo broke his opponent 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. Ocleppo conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vincent Ruggeri | |||
| Q1 Dominko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 57-38 | 57-38 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 22/44 | 22/44 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 18/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ocleppo | |||
| Q1 Iannaccone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 96-81 | 96-81 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 59/93 | 59/93 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/34 | 13/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 70% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWWL
LWWLLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miguel DamasDamas – Orlando LuzLuz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Gian Matias Di NataleMatias Di Natale (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
