Mitchell Krueger and Jacob Brumm will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Stanford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:00 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.06
Jacob Brumm -> 7.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Jacob Brumm
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Jacob Brumm since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-17 | 18-8 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 277, the American got to the qualifications after beating Hudson Rivera 6-1 7-62.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Rivera (6-1 7-62). During the match, Krueger scored 85 points vs Rivera’s 57. Mitchell was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mitchell Krueger was pretty efficient on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Rivera 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Krueger has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (306-282). 9-13 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Krueger has a composed 202-175 record in the last years on hard.
Mitchell’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Dallas.
Mitchell has an aggregate 20-19 win-loss record in 2023, 9-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Krueger has never competed in this tournament before.
Jacob Brumm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-20 | 6-9 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 17-18 | 15-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-16 | 15-11 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-15 | 23-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 726, Jacob reached the qualifications after defeating Blake Ellis 6-3 3-3 ret..
In the qualifications against Ellis, the American had a free pass after Ellis retired on a 6-3 3-3 . scoreline.
Brumm’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 San Diego.
The American has a compiled 28-22 win-loss record in 2023, 11-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 |
| Pts | 85-57 | 49-42 |
| Total Points | 142 | 91 |
| Winners | 28 | 19 |
| %Winners | 33% | 39% |
Both Krueger and Brumm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Krueger has played 1 set(s) less than Brumm (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Krueger played 5 games more than Brumm. The American scored 28 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob made 19 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 34/54 | 29/47 |
| %1st in | 63% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 19/29 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 8/18 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 44% |
Krueger managed to score 3 aces . Brumm blasted 3 aces . Krueger won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Brumm won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 30% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Krueger broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Mitchell had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Brumm conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Rivera |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 85-57 | 85-57 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/54 | 34/54 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Brumm | |||
| Q1 Ellis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 49-42 | 49-42 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWWW
LLLWWLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Gage BrymerBrymer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
