Evan Burnett and Emilio Nava will play each other in the qualifications of the Stanford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 3:00 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.064
Evan Burnett -> 7.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Evan Burnett vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Evan Burnett and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Evan Burnett
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 3-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Burnett reached the qualifications after defeating Kyle Seelig 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Seelig (6-2 7-5). During the match, Burnett scored 86 points vs Seelig’s 70. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Burnett scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Evan Burnett lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Burnett put 59% of his first serves in, winning 70% (32/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Seelig 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Burnett has a fantastic record in the last 1 years having won 100% of his matches (1-0). 1-0 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Burnett has an aggregate1-0 win-loss record in the last 1 years on hard.
The American has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Evan has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 184, Emilio reached the qualifications after beating Calum Puttergill 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Puttergill (6-1 6-3). During the match Nava scored 66 points vs Puttergill’s 46. Emilio was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava fired 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emilio Nava was pretty effective on serve to win 80% (20/25) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Puttergill 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Modena Challenger where he beat Titouan Droguet in the final 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Nava has a composed 23-21 win-loss record in 2023, 11-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Burnett | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
| Pts | 86-70 | 66-46 |
| Total Points | 156 | 112 |
| Winners | 32 | 20 |
| %Winners | 37% | 30% |
Both Burnett and Nava played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Burnett and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Burnett played 4 games more than Nava. The American scored 32 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Nava struck 20 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Burnett | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 7 |
| 1st in | 46/78 | 25/45 |
| %1st in | 59% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 32/46 | 20/25 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 13/20 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Burnett managed to score 1 ace . Nava also fired 7 aces . Burnett won 70% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Burnett | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 29% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 |
| Saved | 9 | 2 |
| % Saved | 90% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Emilio was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Burnett | |||
| Q1 Seelig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 86-70 | 86-70 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 46/78 | 46/78 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 32/46 | 32/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 16/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Puttergill |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 66-46 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 20/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLWL
LWLWWWLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Gage BrymerBrymer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
