Nick Chappell and Gage Brymer will face off in the qualifications of the Stanford Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nick Chappell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nick Chappell is the pick to win this match.
Nick Chappell -> 1.26
Gage Brymer -> 3.58
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nick Chappell vs. Gage Brymer
This will be the 2nd time that Nick Chappell and Gage Brymer fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Chappell (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Chappell won 6-4 6-3 in the semifinal in M15 Cancun back in 2019.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-26 | 19-18 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, the American got to the qualifications after defeating James Tracy 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Chappell had a good straight sets win against Tracy (6-4 6-4). During the match, Chappell scored 73 points vs Tracy’s 57. Nick was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chappell wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 4 double faults. Nick Chappell lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 59% of his first serves in, winning 58% (21/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the 2nd serve. Nick was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Tracy 6 times.
Chappell has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (187-182). 23-13 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Chappell has a compiled 125-88 record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Tulsa.
Chappell has an overall 28-22 win-loss record in 2023, 23-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Nick has never competed in this tournament before.
Gage Brymer
15 - 25win/loss
873
444
LWWLWLLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 783, the American reached the qualifications after beating Nathan Ponwith 1-6 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications against Ponwith, Gage recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-1 6-1). During the match Brymer scored 71 points vs Ponwith’s 58. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Brymer struck 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Gage Brymer lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Brymer put 69% of his first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the 2nd serve. Gage broke Ponwith 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Gage’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
Gage has an aggregate 15-24 win-loss record in 2023, 15-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chappell | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 |
| Pts | 73-57 | 71-58 |
| Total Points | 130 | 129 |
| Winners | 21 | 24 |
| %Winners | 29% | 34% |
Both Chappell and Brymer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Gage Brymer lost 1 set while Nick Chappell hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Chappell has played 1 set(s) less than Brymer (2 vs 3). Therefore, Chappell played 1 game less than Brymer. Nick scored 21 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 24 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chappell | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 35/51 |
| %1st in | 59% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 21/36 | 24/35 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 12/16 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 75% |
Chappell didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Brymer scored 3 aces . Chappell won 58% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Brymer won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chappell | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/6 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 100% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 33% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 100% conversion rate. Chappell dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Brymer broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gage conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chappell | |||
| Q1 Tracy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 73-57 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 36/61 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 21/36 | 21/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Brymer | |||
| Q1 Ponwith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 71-58 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 35/51 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Gage BrymerBrymer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
