Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Benjamin Hassan will clash against each other in the quarter of the Meerbusch Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:00 pm on B&B COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Camilo Ugo Carabelli who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Camilo Ugo Carabelli is the pick to win this match.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli -> 1.53
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Benjamin Hassan
There is no head to head record between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Benjamin Hassan since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 58-30 | 6-5 | 52-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-26 | 0-2 | 41-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-24 | 3-4 | 36-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-24 | 4-2 | 39-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 18-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Camilo reached the quarter after beating Tibo Colson 6-2 6-2 and Ergi Kirkin 6-1 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Camilo had a good straight sets win against Kirkin (6-1 6-4). During the match, Ugo Carabelli scored 60 points vs Kirkin’s 41. Camilo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ugo Carabelli scored 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Camilo Ugo Carabelli lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Ugo Carabelli put 80% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Kirkin 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ugo Carabelli hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Ugo Carabelli has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (270-160). 23-17 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ugo Carabelli has a composed243-137 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Ugo Carabelli’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger.
Ugo Carabelli has an aggregate 23-18 win-loss record in 2023, 23-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Meerbusch Challenger
Ugo Carabelli has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Hassan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-39 | 8-12 | 20-16 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 253, the Lebanese got to the quarter after defeating Henri Laaksonen 7-63 6-1 and Sumit Nagal 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Hassan had a good straight sets win against Nagal (6-2 6-2). During the match Hassan scored 53 points vs Nagal’s 33. Benjamin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Hassan made 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Benjamin Hassan was exceptionally effective on serve to win 88% (23/26) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Benjamin broke Nagal 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Hassan hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points he played.
Benjamin’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger,the Florianopolis Challenger,the Blois Challenger and the Braunschweig Challenger.
The Lebanese has a compiled 33-22 win-loss record in 2023, 23-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ugo Carabelli | Hassan |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 33 | 36 |
Pts | 122-83 | 122-81 |
Total Points | 205 | 203 |
Winners | 57 | 47 |
%Winners | 47% | 39% |
Both Ugo Carabelli and Hassan played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ugo Carabelli and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Ugo Carabelli played 3 games less than Hassan. The Argentine scored 57 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Hassan managed to score 47 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ugo Carabelli | Hassan |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 11 |
Avg per match | 2.5 | 5.5 |
1st in | 85/108 | 56/91 |
%1st in | 79% | 62% |
1st pts | 57/85 | 47/56 |
%1st pts | 67% | 84% |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 20/35 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 57% |
Ugo Carabelli managed to score 5 aces (2.5 per match). Hassan struck 11 aces (5.5 per match). Ugo Carabelli won 67% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ugo Carabelli | Hassan |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 8 |
Converted | 9/15 | 8/14 |
% Converted | 60% | 57% |
Conceded | 10 | 1 |
Saved | 8 | 0 |
% Saved | 80% | 0% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. Ugo Carabelli surrendered his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Hassan broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Hassan conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Ugo Carabelli | ||||
R1 Colson |
R2 Kirkin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 33 | |
pts | 62-42 | 60-41 | 122-83 | |
Total points | 104 | 101 | 205 | |
Winners | 26 | 31 | 57 | |
%Winners | 42% | 52% | 47% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 38/49 | 47/59 | 85/108 | |
% 1st in | 78% | 80% | 79% | |
1st pts | 26/38 | 31/47 | 57/85 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 66% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 6/11 | 7/12 | 13/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 58% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 4/6 | 9/15 | |
Converted % | 56% | 67% | 60% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4/5 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Hassan | ||||
R1 Laaksonen |
R2 Nagal |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-1 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 36 | |
pts | 69-48 | 53-33 | 122-81 | |
Total points | 117 | 86 | 203 | |
Winners | 24 | 23 | 47 | |
%Winners | 35% | 43% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 30/51 | 26/40 | 56/91 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 65% | 62% | |
1st pts | 24/30 | 23/26 | 47/56 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 88% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 11/21 | 9/14 | 20/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 64% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction