Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Ergi Kirkin will square off in the 2nd round of the Meerbusch Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:00 pm on YONEX COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Camilo Ugo Carabelli who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Camilo Ugo Carabelli is the pick to win this match.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli -> 1.4
Ergi Kirkin -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Ergi Kirkin
There is no head to head record between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Ergi Kirkin since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-26 | 2-4 | 39-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-26 | 0-2 | 41-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-24 | 3-4 | 36-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 4-2 | 39-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 18-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after defeating Tibo Colson 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Ugo Carabelli had a good straight sets win against Colson (6-2 6-2). During the match, Ugo Carabelli scored 62 points vs Colson’s 42. Camilo was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ugo Carabelli scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Camilo Ugo Carabelli lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Ugo Carabelli put 78% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the 2nd serve. Camilo broke Colson 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Ugo Carabelli has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (269-160). 22-17 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ugo Carabelli has a compiled242-137 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Camilo’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger.
Ugo Carabelli has a compiled 22-18 win-loss record in 2023, 22-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Meerbusch Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Ergi Kirkin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-25 | 11-4 | 29-19 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-26 | 3-4 | 39-15 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-28 | 3-5 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-27 | 4-8 | 29-16 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-8 | 14-3 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 444, the Turk got to the 2nd round after beating Marcelo Zormann 6-3 6-1, John Sperle 7-62 6-3 and Rudolf Molleker 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Turk had a good straight sets win against Molleker (6-4 7-63). During the match Kirkin scored 75 points vs Molleker’s 66. Kirkin was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Kirkin managed to score 8 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Ergi Kirkin was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (31/41) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Turk broke Molleker 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Ergi’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Doboj and M15 Belgrade.
Kirkin has a composed 33-15 win-loss record in 2023, 28-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ugo Carabelli | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 61 |
| Pts | 62-42 | 209-169 |
| Total Points | 104 | 378 |
| Winners | 26 | 78 |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% |
Ugo Carabelli played 1 match while Kirkin competed in 3 matches. Kirkin started his run from the qualifications while Ugo Carabelli had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Ugo Carabelli has played 4 set(s) less than Kirkin (2 vs 6). Therefore, Ugo Carabelli played 45 games less than Kirkin. Ugo Carabelli scored 26 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Kirkin struck 78 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ugo Carabelli | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 38/49 | 109/175 |
| %1st in | 78% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 78/109 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 36/66 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 55% |
Ugo Carabelli made 1 ace . Kirkin also bagged 10 aces (3.3 per match). Ugo Carabelli won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Kirkin won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ugo Carabelli | Kirkin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 13 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 13/23 |
| % Converted | 56% | 57% |
| Conceded | 5 | 12 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Ugo Carabelli broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Camilo dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponents 13 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ugo Carabelli | |||
| R1 Colson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/49 | 38/49 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kirkin | |||||
| Q1 Zormann Da Silva |
Q3 Sperle |
R1 Molleker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 7-62 6-3 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 23 | 61 | |
| pts | 61-40 | 73-63 | 75-66 | 209-169 | |
| Total points | 101 | 136 | 141 | 378 | |
| Winners | 23 | 24 | 31 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 33% | 41% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/47 | 34/63 | 41/65 | 109/175 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 54% | 63% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 24/34 | 31/41 | 78/109 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 71% | 76% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/13 | 16/29 | 14/24 | 36/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 55% | 58% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 4/6 | 3/7 | 13/23 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 67% | 43% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 3/5 | 1/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 60% | 33% | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLLL
LWLLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Meerbusch Challenger
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-73 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Orlando LuzLuz (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tibo ColsonColson (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Miguel DamasDamas (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Felix GillGill (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Max HoukesHoukes (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Nicola KuhnKuhn (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (2-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Marvin MoellerMoeller (7-5 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
