Sumit Nagal and Benjamin Hassan will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Meerbusch Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on B&B COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.41
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Benjamin Hassan
This will be the 2nd time that Sumit Nagal and Benjamin Hassan fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nagal (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Nagal won 6-1 6-3 in the 1st round in the Skopje Challenger back in May 2023.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-15 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, Sumit got to the 2nd round after beating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Rodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3). During the match, Nagal scored 68 points vs Rodriguez Taverna’s 52. Sumit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Sumit Nagal was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nagal broke Rodriguez Taverna 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Nagal has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (286-185). 25-12 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagal has an overall 202-116 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he defeated Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he beat Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
Nagal has an aggregate 33-19 win-loss record in 2023, 25-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Meerbusch Challenger
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-20 | 3-7 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 253, the Lebanese reached the 2nd round after defeating Henri Laaksonen 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Lebanese had a good straight sets win against Laaksonen (7-63 6-1). During the match Hassan scored 69 points vs Laaksonen’s 48. Benjamin was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Hassan struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Hassan was quite effective on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hassan broke Laaksonen 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Lebanese’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger,the Florianopolis Challenger,the Blois Challenger and the Braunschweig Challenger.
Benjamin has an overall 32-22 win-loss record in 2023, 22-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Meerbusch Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 |
| Pts | 68-52 | 69-48 |
| Total Points | 120 | 117 |
| Winners | 26 | 24 |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% |
Both Nagal and Hassan played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nagal and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nagal played 2 games less than Hassan. Sumit scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Hassan struck 24 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 30/51 |
| %1st in | 65% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 24/30 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 11/21 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 52% |
Nagal struck 1 ace . Hassan also blasted 6 aces . Nagal won 72% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 43% | 57% |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Indian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Nagal very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Lebanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Lebanese conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Rodriguez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-52 | 68-52 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 36/55 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Hassan | |||
| R1 Laaksonen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 69-48 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 30/51 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWWW
LLWLLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Meerbusch Challenger
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tibo ColsonColson (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Orlando LuzLuz (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Miguel DamasDamas (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Felix GillGill (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-73 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Max HoukesHoukes (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Marvin MoellerMoeller (7-5 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Nicola KuhnKuhn (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (2-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (2-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
