Adam Walton and Billy Harris will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Cary 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.57
Billy Harris -> 2.29
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Billy Harris
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Billy Harris since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-19 | 36-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, Walton reached the 2nd round after defeating Beibit Zhukayev 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Zhukayev (6-4 6-3). During the match, Walton scored 58 points vs Zhukayev’s 43. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton bagged 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Adam Walton was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Walton broke Zhukayev 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Walton has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 69% of his matches (93-42). 41-20 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Walton has a compiled91-36 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Santo Domingo,M15 Tbilisi and M25 Tulsa.
Walton has an aggregate 41-21 win-loss record in 2023, 41-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary 1 Challenger
Adam has never competed in this tournament before.
Billy Harris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 3-3 | 6-8 | 5-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-34 | 27-15 | 7-8 | 14-5 | 11-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-34 | 23-13 | 10-9 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 51-20 | 13-5 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-13 | 19-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333, the Brit reached the 2nd round after defeating Donald Young 6-4 6-4, Jaimee Floyd Angele 7-61 7-5 and Emilio Gomez 7-5 7-65.
In the 1st round, Billy had a good straight sets win against Gomez (7-5 7-65). During the match Harris scored 91 points vs Gomez’s 78. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Harris recorded 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Billy Harris was very efficient on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Harris broke Gomez twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Harris’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Las Franquesas del Valles Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has a composed 31-22 win-loss record in 2023, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 70 |
| Pts | 58-43 | 238-209 |
| Total Points | 101 | 447 |
| Winners | 21 | 112 |
| %Winners | 36% | 47% |
Walton played 1 match while Harris competed in 3 matches. Harris started his run from the qualifications while Walton had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Walton has played 4 set(s) less than Harris (2 vs 6). Therefore, Walton played 51 games less than Harris. Walton scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Harris struck 112 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 140/231 |
| %1st in | 62% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 112/140 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 51/91 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 56% |
Walton managed to score 5 aces . Harris made 24 aces (8 per match). Walton won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Harris won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 44% | 36% |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 10 |
| % Saved | 0% | 91% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Adam broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Adam surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Harris conceded his serve once and he saved 91% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| R1 Zhukayev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 58-43 | 58-43 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Harris | |||||
| Q1 Young |
Q3 Floyd |
R1 Gomez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-61 7-5 | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 25 | 70 | |
| pts | 65-55 | 82-76 | 91-78 | 238-209 | |
| Total points | 120 | 158 | 169 | 447 | |
| Winners | 32 | 38 | 42 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 46% | 46% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 14 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/64 | 49/83 | 54/84 | 140/231 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 38/49 | 42/54 | 112/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 78% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 21/34 | 16/30 | 51/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 62% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 1/2 | 2/5 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 50% | 40% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 5/5 | 5/6 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 83% | 183% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLLLWWWW
LWWLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Cary 1 Challenger
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Emilio GomezGomez (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-74 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (3-6 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Leandro RiediRiedi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Karl PolingPoling (6-2 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-72 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Keegan SmithSmith (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
