![Prediction And Head To Head Kenny De Schepper Vs. Federico Iannaccone Ogyvmlaetn Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Federico Iannaccone](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Kenny-de-Schepper-vs.-Federico-Iannaccone-ogyvmLaetn.jpg)
Kenny de Schepper and Federico Iannaccone will square off in the qualifications of the Cordenons Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kenny de Schepper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kenny de Schepper is the pick to win this match.
Kenny de Schepper -> 1.74
Federico Iannaccone -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Federico Iannaccone
There is no head to head record between Kenny de Schepper and Federico Iannaccone since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Kenny de Schepper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-16 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 420, De Schepper got to the qualifications after defeating Gregorio De Gasper 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Kenny had a good straight sets win against De Gasper (6-1 6-0). During the match, de Schepper scored 51 points vs De Gasper’s 13. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, de Schepper blasted 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Kenny de Schepper was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (19/24) of his 1st serve and 100% (9/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke De Gasper 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
de Schepper has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (298-269). 7-9 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, de Schepper has an overall 91-108 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The French player best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Porto.
The French player has an overall 23-20 win-loss record in 2023, 7-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cordenons Challenger
Federico Iannaccone
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-19 | 11-7 | 11-10 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-30 | 13-6 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-24 | 11-10 | 15-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 16-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 572, Federico reached the qualifications after defeating Wilson Leite 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Leite (6-3 6-3). During the match Iannaccone scored 66 points vs Leite’s 48. Federico was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Iannaccone blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Federico Iannaccone lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Iannaccone put 62% of his first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Iannaccone broke Leite 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Iannaccone’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Iannaccone has an overall 34-20 win-loss record in 2023, 21-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | de Schepper | Iannaccone |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 13 | 18 |
Pts | 51-13 | 66-48 |
Total Points | 64 | 114 |
Winners | 19 | 22 |
%Winners | 37% | 33% |
Both de Schepper and Iannaccone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, de Schepper and Iannaccone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, de Schepper played 5 games less than Iannaccone. Kenny scored 19 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Federico recorded 22 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | de Schepper | Iannaccone |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 2 |
Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
1st in | 24/33 | 34/55 |
%1st in | 73% | 62% |
1st pts | 19/24 | 22/34 |
%1st pts | 79% | 65% |
2nd pts | 9/9 | 10/21 |
%2nd pts | 100% | 48% |
de Schepper recorded 4 aces . Iannaccone struck 2 aces . de Schepper won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 100% of the points. On the other side, Iannaccone won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | de Schepper | Iannaccone |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/10 | 6/11 |
% Converted | 50% | 55% |
Conceded | 0 | 3 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
De Schepper broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. De Schepper quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Iannaccone broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Iannaccone conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
de Schepper | |||
Q1 De Gasper |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
pts | 51-13 | 51-13 | |
Total points | 64 | 64 | |
Winners | 19 | 19 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 9/9 | 9/9 | |
% 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Iannaccone | |||
Q1 Leite |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 66-48 | 66-48 | |
Total points | 114 | 114 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 34/55 | 34/55 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Blaz RolaRola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian OcleppoOcleppo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandr BrayninBraynin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction