![Prediction And Head To Head Peyton Stearns Vs. Magdalena Frech Jnenlh9d50 Prediction and head to head Peyton Stearns vs. Magdalena Frech](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Peyton-Stearns-vs.-Magdalena-Frech-JNEnlh9d50.jpg)
Peyton Stearns and Magdalena Frech will square off in the qualifications of the Omnium Banque Nationale for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 3:00 pm on Court Central. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peyton Stearns who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Peyton Stearns is the pick to win this match.
Peyton Stearns -> 1.615
Magdalena Frech -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peyton Stearns vs. Magdalena Frech
This will be the 2nd time that Peyton Stearns and Magdalena Frech face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Stearns (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Stearns won 6-1 6-4 in the 1st round in Washington back in August 2023.
Peyton Stearns
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-19 | 7-11 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-23 | 19-13 | 19-7 | 6-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-15 | 29-12 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-9 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 6-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Katherine Sebov 4-6 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications against Sebov, Peyton recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-1). During the match, Stearns scored 90 points vs Sebov’s 76. Peyton was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stearns struck 3 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Peyton Stearns lost the serve 3 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Stearns put 67% of her first serves in, winning 66% (37/56) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Peyton broke Sebov 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Stearns has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of her matches (122-72). 12-5 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Stearns has an aggregate71-42 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W25 Orlando where she beat Robin Montgomery in the final 6-2 6-0 and the W60 Rome where she overcame Gabriela Andrea Knutson in the final 3-6 6-0 6-2.
Stearns has a compiled 37-14 win-loss record in 2023, 12-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Magdalena Frech
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-23 | 16-9 | 10-9 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-32 | 23-21 | 10-5 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-38 | 22-19 | 11-12 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-19 | 12-5 | 16-8 | 6-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
2020 | 26-14 | 12-5 | 10-7 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 80, Frech reached the qualifications after defeating Storm Hunter 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Magdalena had a good straight sets win against Sanders (6-2 6-2). During the match Frech scored 61 points vs Sanders’s 41. Magdalena was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Frech scored 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Magdalena Frech conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Frech put 58% of her first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 81% (17/21) on the 2nd serve. Magdalena broke Sanders 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
Magdalena has a compiled 26-21 win-loss record in 2023, 10-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Stearns | Frech |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 26 | 16 |
Pts | 90-76 | 61-41 |
Total Points | 166 | 102 |
Winners | 37 | 20 |
%Winners | 41% | 33% |
Both Stearns and Frech played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Peyton Stearns surrendered 1 set while Magdalena Frech hasn’t lost a set so far. Stearns has played 1 set more than Frech (3 vs 2). Therefore, Stearns played 10 games more than Frech. Peyton scored 37 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Magdalena blasted 20 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Stearns | Frech |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 2 |
Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
1st in | 56/84 | 29/50 |
%1st in | 67% | 58% |
1st pts | 37/56 | 20/29 |
%1st pts | 66% | 69% |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 17/21 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 81% |
Stearns managed to score 3 aces . Frech fired 2 aces . Stearns won 66% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Frech won 69% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 81% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Stearns | Frech |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 4 |
Converted | 6/11 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 55% | 36% |
Conceded | 4 | 3 |
Saved | 1 | 3 |
% Saved | 25% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Peyton broke her opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Peyton lost her serve 3 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded. Frech broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Frech was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Stearns | |||
Q1 Sebov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 90-76 | 90-76 | |
Total points | 166 | 166 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 56/84 | 56/84 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Frech | |||
Q1 Sanders |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
Total points | 102 | 102 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 29/50 | 29/50 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Montreal
- Alexander BublikBublik – Taro DanielDaniel (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Kevin KingKing (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (7-5 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Denis KudlaKudla (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Cristina BucsaBucsa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Emina BektasBektas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Kayla DayDay (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Magdalena FrechFrech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Donna VekicVekic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Venus WilliamsWilliams – Madison KeysKeys (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Shuai ZhangZhang (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (2-5) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Magda LinetteLinette (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Belinda BencicBencic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction