Laslo Djere and Pedro Cachin will square off in the quarter of the Generali Open for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laslo Djere who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Laslo Djere is the pick to win this match.
Laslo Djere -> 1.84
Pedro Cachin -> 1.97

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Laslo Djere vs. Pedro Cachin

This will be the 2^nd time that Laslo Djere and Pedro Cachin fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Cachin (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.

The last time that they locked horns, Cachin won 3-6 6-1 6-1 in the qualifications in Gstaad back in 2015.

Laslo Djere

Ranked no. 38, Laslo reached the quarter after defeating Christopher O Connell 6-4 7-6⁴ and Thiago Seyboth Wild 7-6⁵ 6-3.

In the 2^nd round, Laslo had a good straight sets win against Seyboth Wild (7-6⁵ 6-3). During the match, Djere scored 72 points vs Seyboth Wild’s 68. Djere was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.

Regarding the service games, Djere struck 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Laslo Djere was very effective on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 61% (19/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Serbian broke Seyboth Wild once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Laslo hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 51% of the points he played.

Djere has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (333-237). 18-11 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Djere has a composed 263-130 record in the last years on clay.

Laslo’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Cagliari Challenger and Hamburg.

Djere has an aggregate 28-19 win-loss record in 2023, 18-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in Kitzbuhel

Pedro Cachin

Ranked no. 54, Cachin got to the quarter after defeating Albert Ramos-Vinolas 7-5 6-3.

In the 2^nd round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Ramos-Vinolas (7-5 6-3). During the match Cachin scored 71 points vs Ramos-Vinolas’s 61. Pedro was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.

About the serving games, Cachin made 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Pedro Cachin lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Cachin put 54% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Ramos-Vinolas 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).

His best result of the current season was winning the title in Gstaad where he beat Albert Ramos-Vinolas in the final 3-6 6-0 7-5.

Cachin has an overall 26-23 win-loss record in 2023, 25-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Djere	Cachin
Match played	2	1
Tot Set	4	2
Tot Games	45	21
Pts	157-152	71-61
Total Points	309	132
Winners	63	26
%Winners	40%	37%

Djere played 2 matches while Cachin competed in 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Djere has played 2 sets more than Cachin (4 vs 2). Therefore, Djere played 24 games more than Cachin. The Serbian scored 63 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Cachin made 26 winners (37%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Djere	Cachin
Aces	10	7
Avg per match	5	7
1st in	94/171	39/72
%1st in	55%	54%
1st pts	63/94	26/39
%1st pts	67%	67%
2nd pts	44/77	16/33
%2nd pts	57%	48%

Djere scored 10 aces (5 per match). Cachin managed to score 7 aces . Djere won 67% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Cachin won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Djere	Cachin
Won	3	5
Converted	3/10	5/8
% Converted	30%	63%
Conceded	12	9
Saved	11	6
% Saved	92%	67%
Times Broken	1	3

The Serbian broke his opponents 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Laslo conceded his serve once and he saved 92% of the break points that he conceded. Pedro broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.

Djere
	R1 O	R2 Seyboth	Total
Score	6-4 7-64	7-65 6-3
Tot Set	2	2	4
Tot Games	23	22	45
pts	85-84	72-68	157-152
Total points	169	140	309
Winners	31	32	63
%Winners	36%	44%	40%
SERVE
Aces	4	6	10
Double Faults	7	3	10
1st in	49/95	45/76	94/171
% 1st in	52%	59%	55%
1st pts	31/49	32/45	63/94
% 1st pts	63%	71%	67%
2nd pts	25/46	19/31	44/77
% 2nd pts	54%	61%	57%
Breaks
Won	2	1	3
Converted	2/8	1/2	3/10
Converted %	25%	50%	30%
Conceded	8	4	12
Saved	7/8	4/4	11
Saved %	88%	100%	94%
Times Broken	1	0	1

Cachin
	R2 Ramos-Vinolas	Total
Score	7-5 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	21	21
pts	71-61	71-61
Total points	132	132
Winners	26	26
%Winners	37%	37%
SERVE
Aces	7	7
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	39/72	39/72
% 1st in	54%	54%
1st pts	26/39	26/39
% 1st pts	67%	67%
2nd pts	16/33	16/33
% 2nd pts	48%	48%
Breaks
Won	5	5
Converted	5/8	5/8
Converted %	63%	63%
Conceded	9	9
Saved	6/9	6
Saved %	67%	34%
Times Broken	3	3

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Dominic ThiemThiem – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Laslo DjereDjere – Pedro CachinCachin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Alex MolcanMolcan – Sebastian BaezBaez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-1) – H2H and prediction