Dane Sweeny and Cannon Kingsley will play each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cannon Kingsley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cannon Kingsley is the pick to win this match.
Cannon Kingsley -> 1.87
Dane Sweeny -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dane Sweeny vs. Cannon Kingsley
There is no head to head record between Dane Sweeny and Cannon Kingsley since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dane Sweeny
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-15 | 14-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-33 | 25-23 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 62-26 | 59-22 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-23 | 19-15 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, Dane got to the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Boyer 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Boyer (6-3 6-4). During the match, Sweeny scored 58 points vs Boyer’s 44. Sweeny was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sweeny struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dane Sweeny lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sweeny put 69% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Dane was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Boyer 3 times.
Sweeny has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (134-95). 15-13 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sweeny has an aggregate108-63 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Canberra.
Sweeny has a composed 25-22 win-loss record in 2023, 15-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Dane has never competed in this tournament before.
Cannon Kingsley
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-17 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 7-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-10 | 13-5 | 2-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 503, Kingsley reached the 2nd round after defeating Yuki Mochizuki 6-4 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Mochizuki (6-4 4-6 6-3). During the match Kingsley scored 95 points vs Mochizuki’s 77. The American was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Kingsley struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cannon Kingsley was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (41/52) of his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Mochizuki 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Champaign.
Kingsley has a compiled 12-6 win-loss record in 2023, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sweeny | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 29 |
| Pts | 58-44 | 95-77 |
| Total Points | 102 | 172 |
| Winners | 31 | 41 |
| %Winners | 53% | 43% |
Both Sweeny and Kingsley played 1 match. At the moment, Cannon Kingsley dropped 1 set while Dane Sweeny hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sweeny has played 1 set(s) less than Kingsley (2 vs 3). Therefore, Sweeny played 10 games less than Kingsley. Sweeny scored 31 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 41 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sweeny | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 38/55 | 52/80 |
| %1st in | 69% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 41/52 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 18/28 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 64% |
Sweeny bagged 6 aces . Kingsley managed to score 6 aces . Sweeny won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Kingsley won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sweeny | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 100% | 27% |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 50% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Cannon broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Kingsley conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sweeny | |||
| R1 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 58-44 | 58-44 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/55 | 38/55 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kingsley | |||
| R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 95-77 | 95-77 | |
| Total points | 172 | 172 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 52/80 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 41/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/28 | 18/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLLWL
LLLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Bernard TomicTomic (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
