Tristan Schoolkate and Aidan Mayo will face off in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on STADIUM 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.59
Aidan Mayo -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Aidan Mayo
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Aidan Mayo since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-18 | 20-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 268, the Australian got to the 2nd round after beating Philip Sekulic 3-6 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round against Sekulic, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-63 6-1). During the match, Schoolkate scored 96 points vs Sekulic’s 85. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate made 8 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Schoolkate put 68% of his first serves in, winning 83% (50/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (9/28) on the 2nd serve. Tristan broke Sekulic 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Schoolkate has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (118-79). 24-16 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has an overall66-48 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Tristan has an aggregate 36-21 win-loss record in 2023, 24-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-16 | 4-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 416 (career-high), Aidan reached the 2nd round after defeating Cooper Williams 6-4 6-3, Colin Markes 6-2 7-5 and Nathan Ponwith 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Mayo had a good straight sets win against Ponwith (6-4 6-1). During the match Mayo scored 62 points vs Ponwith’s 38. The American was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Mayo fired 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Aidan Mayo lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mayo put 67% of his first serves in, winning 81% (26/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Ponwith 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Mayo’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Xalapa,M15 Tabasco and M25 Dallas.
Mayo has an overall 26-16 win-loss record in 2023, 14-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 56 |
| Pts | 96-85 | 195-137 |
| Total Points | 181 | 332 |
| Winners | 50 | 82 |
| %Winners | 52% | 42% |
Schoolkate played 1 match while Mayo competed in 3 matches. Mayo started his run from the qualifications while Schoolkate had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tristan Schoolkate dropped 1 set while Aidan Mayo hasn’t dropped a set so far. Schoolkate has played 3 set(s) less than Mayo (3 vs 6). Therefore, Schoolkate played 27 games less than Mayo. Schoolkate scored 50 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Aidan struck 82 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 60/88 | 103/165 |
| %1st in | 68% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 50/60 | 82/103 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 9/28 | 31/62 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 50% |
Schoolkate recorded 8 aces . Mayo blasted 19 aces (6.3 per match). Schoolkate won 83% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 13/22 |
| % Converted | 75% | 59% |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 75% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Aidan broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||
| R1 Sekulic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 96-85 | 96-85 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 60/88 | 60/88 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 50/60 | 50/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/28 | 9/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mayo | |||||
| Q1 Williams |
Q3 Markes |
R1 Ponwith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 7-5 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 17 | 56 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 68-55 | 62-38 | 195-137 | |
| Total points | 109 | 123 | 100 | 332 | |
| Winners | 22 | 34 | 26 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 50% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 3 | 8 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 44/69 | 32/48 | 103/165 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 64% | 67% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 34/44 | 26/32 | 82/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 77% | 81% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 11/25 | 7/16 | 31/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 44% | 44% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/5 | 5/8 | 13/22 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 80% | 63% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/3 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 75% | 192% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWWW
WLLWLWLLWL Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Bernard TomicTomic (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Adam WaltonWalton (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
