Adam Walton and Ulises Blanch will square off in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on STADIUM 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.42
Ulises Blanch -> 2.71
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Ulises Blanch
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Ulises Blanch since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Adam Walton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-21 | 36-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 249, Adam got to the 2nd round after defeating Maxime Janvier 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Janvier, Adam recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match, Walton scored 97 points vs Janvier’s 89. Adam was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Walton made 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Adam Walton lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Walton put 57% of his first serves in, winning 78% (42/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. Walton broke Janvier 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Walton has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 69% of his matches (92-41). 40-19 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Walton has a composed90-35 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Adam’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santo Domingo,M15 Tbilisi and M25 Tulsa.
Adam has an overall 40-20 win-loss record in 2023, 40-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Walton has never competed in this tournament before.
Ulises Blanch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-7 | 10-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-23 | 14-11 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-29 | 10-12 | 6-5 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 16-21 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-15 | 7-6 | 3-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 422, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mchugh 7-62 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Mchugh (7-62 6-4). During the match Blanch scored 75 points vs Mchugh’s 65. Ulises was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Blanch struck 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ulises Blanch lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Blanch put 67% of his first serves in, winning 76% (35/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Ulises broke Mchugh 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Ulises has a compiled 17-18 win-loss record in 2023, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 |
| Pts | 97-89 | 75-65 |
| Total Points | 186 | 140 |
| Winners | 42 | 35 |
| %Winners | 43% | 47% |
Both Walton and Blanch played 1 match. At the moment, Adam Walton lost 1 set while Ulises Blanch hasn’t lost a set so far. Walton has played 1 set more than Blanch (3 vs 2). Therefore, Walton played 5 games more than Blanch. Adam scored 42 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Blanch recorded 35 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 11 |
| 1st in | 54/95 | 46/69 |
| %1st in | 57% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 42/54 | 35/46 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 43% |
Walton made 10 aces . Blanch made 11 aces . Walton won 78% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 38% | 60% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Adam conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Blanch broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Blanch conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| R1 Janvier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 97-89 | 97-89 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 54/95 | 54/95 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 42/54 | 42/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Blanch | |||
| R1 Mchugh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 75-65 | 75-65 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/69 | 46/69 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 35/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLLL
LLLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Philip SekulicSekulic (3-6 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Tristan BoyerBoyer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Justin BoulaisBoulais (7-5 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Nathan PonwithPonwith (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Aidan MchughMchugh (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Ryan PenistonPeniston (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Billy HarrisHarris (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Martin DammDamm (6-74 7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Christian HarrisonHarrison (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Joshua LapadatLapadat (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Maxime JanvierJanvier (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Tristan BoyerBoyer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
