Nerman Fatic and Kyrian Jacquet will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the San Marino Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.7
Kyrian Jacquet -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Kyrian Jacquet
There is no head to head record between Nerman Fatic and Kyrian Jacquet since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-16 | 3-3 | 6-12 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222, Fatic got to the 2nd round after defeating Roman Andres Burruchaga 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Fatic defeated Andres Burruchaga (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Fatic scored 96 points vs Andres Burruchaga’s 91. Fatic was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic blasted 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 58% (32/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Fatic broke Andres Burruchaga 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Fatic has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (295-205). 19-15 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fatic has an overall245-156 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Fatic’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Modena Challenger.
Fatic has a compiled 19-15 win-loss record in 2023, 19-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Marino Challenger
Kyrian Jacquet
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-22 | 11-5 | 27-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-25 | 9-5 | 19-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-28 | 1-3 | 19-14 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 303, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Lorenzo Bocchi 6-3 6-3, Gianmarco Ferrari 6-4 6-4 and Flavio Cobolli 6-3 4-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Kyrian defeated Cobolli (6-3 4-6 6-1). During the match Jacquet scored 94 points vs Cobolli’s 80. Kyrian was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Jacquet bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Kyrian Jacquet lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jacquet put 61% of his first serves in, winning 71% (37/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Jacquet broke Cobolli 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Jacquet’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Blois Challenger.
Jacquet has an overall 30-14 win-loss record in 2023, 27-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Marino Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Jacquet |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 64 |
| Pts | 96-91 | 233-191 |
| Total Points | 187 | 424 |
| Winners | 32 | 92 |
| %Winners | 33% | 39% |
Fatic played 1 match while Jacquet competed in 3 matches. Jacquet started his run from the qualifications while Fatic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Nerman Fatic conceded 1 set, while Kyrian Jacquet surrendered 1 set. Fatic has played 4 set(s) less than Jacquet (3 vs 7). Therefore, Fatic played 37 games less than Jacquet. Nerman scored 32 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Kyrian made 92 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Jacquet |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 121/200 |
| %1st in | 60% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 32/55 | 92/121 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 40/79 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 51% |
Fatic struck 2 aces . Jacquet made 9 aces (3 per match). Fatic won 58% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Jacquet won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Jacquet |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 12 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 12/28 |
| % Converted | 54% | 43% |
| Conceded | 12 | 14 |
| Saved | 7 | 10 |
| % Saved | 58% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The Bosnian broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Nerman dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. Jacquet conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Andres |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 96-91 | 96-91 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 55/91 | 55/91 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 32/55 | 32/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 18/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Jacquet | |||||
| Q1 Bocchi |
Q3 Ferrari |
R1 Cobolli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 26 | 64 | |
| pts | 69-50 | 70-61 | 94-80 | 233-191 | |
| Total points | 119 | 131 | 174 | 424 | |
| Winners | 27 | 28 | 37 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 35/56 | 34/59 | 52/85 | 121/200 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 58% | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 28/34 | 37/52 | 92/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 82% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 13/25 | 16/33 | 40/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | 48% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 12/28 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 33% | 56% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3/4 | 4/6 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | 67% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWLL
LLWWWLWWLL Tennis Scores in San Marino Challenger
- David GoffinGoffin – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Aziz DougazDougaz (6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Marcello SerafiniSerafini (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Gianluca MagerMager (7-5 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Carlos TabernerTaberner (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Marco De RossiDe Rossi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Moez EcharguiEchargui (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
