Aidan Mayo and Colin Markes will square off in the qualifications of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 6. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aidan Mayo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Aidan Mayo is the pick to win this match.
Aidan Mayo -> 1.5
Colin Markes -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Aidan Mayo vs. Colin Markes
There is no head to head record between Aidan Mayo and Colin Markes since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-32 | 16-18 | 4-4 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 421 (career-high), the American reached the qualifications after defeating Cooper Williams 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Mayo had a good straight sets win against Williams (6-4 6-3). During the match, Mayo scored 65 points vs Williams’s 44. Aidan was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mayo made 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was very effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Williams 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Mayo has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 57% of his matches (71-53). 12-8 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mayo has an aggregate49-34 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Xalapa,M15 Tabasco and M25 Dallas.
Aidan has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2023, 12-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Colin Markes
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-34 | 18-20 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-33 | 47-28 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-8 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 634, the American reached the qualifications after beating Blu Baker 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Baker (6-4 7-5). During the match Markes scored 69 points vs Baker’s 54. Colin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Markes bagged 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Colin Markes was very effective on serve to win 80% (33/41) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Baker 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The American has a compiled 14-20 win-loss record in 2023, 11-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mayo | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 65-44 | 69-54 |
| Total Points | 109 | 123 |
| Winners | 22 | 33 |
| %Winners | 34% | 48% |
Both Mayo and Markes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mayo and Markes have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mayo played 3 games less than Markes. Aidan scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 33 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mayo | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 6 |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 41/60 |
| %1st in | 56% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 33/41 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 11/19 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 58% |
Mayo bagged 8 aces . Markes recorded 6 aces . Mayo won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Markes won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mayo | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 44% | 60% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Markes broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Markes conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mayo | |||
| Q1 Williams |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 27/48 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Markes | |||
| Q1 Baker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/60 | 41/60 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 33/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
L 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Joshua LapadatLapadat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Makoto OchiOchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – Jaimee Floyd AngelFloyd Angel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
