Pedro Sakamoto and Hazem Naow will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hazem Naow who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hazem Naow is the pick to win this match.
Hazem Naow -> 1.87
Pedro Sakamoto -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pedro Sakamoto vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Pedro Sakamoto and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Pedro Sakamoto
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-15 | 1-1 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-24 | 4-2 | 35-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-24 | 2-3 | 19-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-14 | 2-2 | 14-10 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 624, Sakamoto got to the qualifications after beating Akira Santillan 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Sakamoto had a good straight sets win against Santillan (6-3 6-4). During the match, Sakamoto scored 62 points vs Santillan’s 52. Sakamoto was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sakamoto managed to score 2 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Pedro Sakamoto lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sakamoto put 70% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Sakamoto broke Santillan 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Sakamoto has positive record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (299-219). 16-12 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sakamoto has an aggregate 285-198 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Pedro’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Cali Challenger.
Pedro has an aggregate 16-12 win-loss record in 2023, 16-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Pedro has never competed in this tournament before.
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-13 | 0-0 | 8-7 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 48-24 | 17-5 | 25-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 14-6 | 8-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 42-18 | 32-13 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 625, Naow got to the qualifications after beating Stefanos Sakellaridis 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, Naow had a good straight sets win against Sakellaridis (6-3 6-0). During the match Naow scored 60 points vs Sakellaridis’s 36. Naow was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Naow couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Hazem Naow conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 66% of his first serves in, winning 78% (29/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Naow broke Sakellaridis 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Hazem’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kish Island.
The Syrian has an aggregate 27-14 win-loss record in 2023, 16-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sakamoto | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
| Pts | 62-52 | 60-36 |
| Total Points | 114 | 96 |
| Winners | 30 | 29 |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% |
Both Sakamoto and Naow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sakamoto and Naow have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sakamoto played 4 games more than Naow. The Brazilian scored 30 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Naow managed to score 29 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sakamoto | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 44/63 | 37/56 |
| %1st in | 70% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 29/37 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 9/19 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 47% |
Sakamoto bagged 2 aces . Naow didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sakamoto won 68% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sakamoto | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 57% | 57% |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Sakamoto broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Brazilian conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Syrian broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Syrian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
| Sakamoto | |||
| Q1 Santillan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 62-52 | 62-52 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 44/63 | 44/63 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Sakellaridis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-36 | 60-36 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLL
LLLLWLLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Henri SquireSquire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Daniel MasurMasur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Marcelo ZormannZormann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Wilson LeiteLeite (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-1) – H2H and prediction
