Lauren Davis and Ashlyn Krueger will play each other in the qualifications of the Mubadala Citi DC Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:00 pm on John Harris. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lauren Davis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lauren Davis is the pick to win this match.
Lauren Davis -> 1.69
Ashlyn Krueger -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lauren Davis vs. Ashlyn Krueger
There is no head to head record between Lauren Davis and Ashlyn Krueger since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Lauren Davis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-15 | 5-6 | 2-6 | 5-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-20 | 16-11 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 14-12 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-21 | 8-11 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-12 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 52, Lauren got to the qualifications after defeating Alana Smith 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Smith, Davis recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Davis scored 101 points vs Smith’s 83. Lauren was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Davis made 7 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Lauren Davis was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (35/44) of her 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Davis broke Smith 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Davis has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (250-211). 13-5 on hard in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Davis has a compiled 138-122 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was conquering the title in Hobart where she overcame Elisabetta Cocciaretto in the final 7-6(0) 6-2.
Lauren has a composed 22-14 win-loss record in 2023, 13-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Ashlyn Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-26 | 19-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 10-11 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 123, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Rebecca Peterson 6-3 3-6 7-65.
In the qualifications, Krueger defeated Peterson (6-3 3-6 7-65). During the match Krueger scored 108 points vs Peterson’s 105. Krueger was very aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger made 12 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve 3 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 58% of her first serves in, winning 80% (53/66) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (17/47) on the 2nd serve. Krueger broke Peterson 3 times after converting 27% of her break points (3/11).
Her best result of the season was winning the title the Gaiba where she beat Tatjana Maria in the final 3-6 6-4 7-5.
The American has an overall 34-18 win-loss record in 2023, 17-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Davis | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 31 |
| Pts | 101-83 | 108-105 |
| Total Points | 184 | 213 |
| Winners | 35 | 53 |
| %Winners | 35% | 49% |
Both Davis and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Lauren Davis dropped 1 set, while Ashlyn Krueger conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Davis and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Davis played 4 games less than Krueger. The American scored 35 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 53 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Davis | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 12 |
| 1st in | 44/78 | 66/113 |
| %1st in | 56% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 35/44 | 53/66 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 17/47 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 36% |
Davis bagged 7 aces . Krueger managed to score 12 aces . Davis won 80% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 80% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Davis | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 40% | 27% |
| Conceded | 6 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 83% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Davis broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Lauren dropped her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded. Krueger broke her opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Ashlyn conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded.
| Davis | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 101-83 | 101-83 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/78 | 44/78 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 35/44 | 35/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Peterson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 108-105 | 108-105 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 66/113 | 66/113 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 53/66 | 53/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/47 | 17/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLWWWLW
LLLWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Washington
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Yannick MadenMaden (7-61 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Norbert GombosGombos – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Madison KeysKeys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Petra MarticMartic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Marta KostyukKostyuk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
