Sho Shimabukuro and Bradley Klahn will play each other in the qualifications of the Citi Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sho Shimabukuro who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sho Shimabukuro is the pick to win this match.
Sho Shimabukuro -> 1.26
Bradley Klahn -> 3.58
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sho Shimabukuro vs. Bradley Klahn
There is no head to head record between Sho Shimabukuro and Bradley Klahn since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Sho Shimabukuro
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-28 | 21-17 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 19-17 | 7-1 | 9-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-25 | 38-20 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-20 | 28-18 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, Sho got to the qualifications after defeating Donald Young 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Young (6-3 6-4). During the match, Shimabukuro scored 70 points vs Young’s 57. The Japanese was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shimabukuro made 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sho Shimabukuro was pretty effective on serve to win 84% (26/31) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sho broke Young twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Shimabukuro has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 65% of his matches (197-107). 13-9 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Shimabukuro has an overall151-78 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger where he defeated Arthur Cazaux in the final 6-2 7-5 and the Tunis Challenger where he defeated Geoffrey Blancaneaux in the final 6-4 6-4.
Sho has a composed 29-15 win-loss record in 2023, 13-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Bradley Klahn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-10 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-11 | 4-5 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 24-28 | 23-17 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 799, the American got to the qualifications after defeating James Kent Trotter 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, Klahn had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-4 7-64). During the match Klahn scored 79 points vs Kent Trotter’s 68. Bradley was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Klahn blasted 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Bradley Klahn was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (38/46) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Bradley broke Kent Trotter once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
The American has a composed 3-8 win-loss record in 2023, 2-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shimabukuro | Klahn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 23 |
| Pts | 70-57 | 79-68 |
| Total Points | 127 | 147 |
| Winners | 26 | 38 |
| %Winners | 37% | 48% |
Both Shimabukuro and Klahn played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Shimabukuro and Klahn have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Shimabukuro played 4 games less than Klahn. Shimabukuro scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Bradley scored 38 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shimabukuro | Klahn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 4 |
| 1st in | 31/61 | 46/72 |
| %1st in | 51% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 38/46 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 58% |
Shimabukuro scored 12 aces . Klahn made 4 aces . Shimabukuro won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Klahn won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shimabukuro | Klahn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 1 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 1/5 |
| % Converted | 25% | 20% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Japanese very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 6 break points. Bradley broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Shimabukuro | |||
| Q1 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-57 | 70-57 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/61 | 31/61 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Klahn | |||
| Q1 Kent |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 79-68 | 79-68 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 46/72 | 46/72 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 38/46 | 38/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jordan ThompsonThompson (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yibing WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Liam BroadyBroady (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Kei NishikoriNishikori (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Bradley KlahnKlahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
