Francisco Comesana and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will play each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francisco Comesana who should win in 2 sets.
Francisco Comesana -> 1.34
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 3.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Francisco Comesana vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
There is no head to head record between Francisco Comesana and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Francisco Comesana
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-28 | 9-9 | 18-13 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-28 | 8-5 | 31-21 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-25 | 2-2 | 57-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-18 | 2-2 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 49-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 238, Francisco got to the 2nd round after beating Marc Polmans 7-65 6-4.
In the 1st round, Comesana had a good straight sets win against Polmans (7-65 6-4). During the match, Comesana scored 81 points vs Polmans’s 69. The Argentine was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Comesana scored 10 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Francisco Comesana was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (33/45) of his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Francisco broke Polmans twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Comesana has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (201-108). 34-13 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Comesana has a compiled192-97 record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Vicenza Challenger where he beat Pablo Llamas Ruiz in the final 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Comesana has a composed 34-14 win-loss record in 2023, 34-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Comesana has never competed in this tournament before.
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-17 | 3-3 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-33 | 12-6 | 26-21 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 403, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Marco Speronello 6-3 5-7 6-3, Max Houkes 2-6 6-4 6-3 and Carlos Taberner 1-6 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round against Taberner, Vincent recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-1 6-4). During the match Vincent scored 71 points vs Taberner’s 69. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Vincent struck 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Vincent put 53% of his first serves in, winning 79% (31/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Taberner 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Samuel’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Cattolica and M25 Padova.
The Italian has a composed 32-20 win-loss record in 2023, 17-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Comesana | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 81 |
| Pts | 81-69 | 242-236 |
| Total Points | 150 | 478 |
| Winners | 33 | 111 |
| %Winners | 41% | 46% |
Comesana played 1 match while Vincent competed in 3 matches. Vincent started his run from the qualifications while Comesana had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri lost 3 sets while Francisco Comesana hasn’t lost a set so far. Comesana has played 7 set(s) less than Vincent (2 vs 9). Therefore, Comesana played 58 games less than Vincent. Comesana scored 33 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Samuel made 111 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Comesana | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 148/245 |
| %1st in | 68% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 111/148 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 44/97 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 45% |
Comesana managed to score 10 aces . Vincent recorded 9 aces (3 per match). Comesana won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Vincent won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Comesana | Vincent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 11 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 11/24 |
| % Converted | 20% | 46% |
| Conceded | 1 | 13 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 8 |
Comesana broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Comesana surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 11 times with a 46% conversion rate. Samuel conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Comesana | |||
| R1 Polmans | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 81-69 | 81-69 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 45/66 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 15/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vincent | |||||
| Q1 Speronello | Q3 Houkes | R1 Taberner | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 27 | 24 | 81 | |
| pts | 87-82 | 84-85 | 71-69 | 242-236 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | 140 | 478 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | 31 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 48% | 44% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 57/91 | 39/74 | 148/245 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 53% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 40/52 | 40/57 | 31/39 | 111/148 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 70% | 79% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 13/34 | 17/35 | 44/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 38% | 49% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 11/24 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 40% | 60% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 3/7 | 2/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 43% | 50% | 93% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (7-5 4-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Sumit NagalNagal (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Valentin RoyerRoyer (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Carlos TabernerTaberner (1-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (5-7 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-72 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Hugo GastonGaston (3-6 6-2 5-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (2-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Jiri VeselyVesely (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction