Vitaliy Sachko and Benjamin Hassan will play each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vitaliy Sachko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vitaliy Sachko is the pick to win this match.
Vitaliy Sachko -> 1.54
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vitaliy Sachko vs. Benjamin Hassan
This will be the 2nd time that Vitaliy Sachko and Benjamin Hassan clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sachko (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Sachko won 4-6 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in the Almaty 2 Challenger back in 2021.
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-13 | 3-3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 188, Vitaliy got to the 2nd round after defeating Guido Andreozzi 2-6 7-65 6-4.
In the 1st round against Andreozzi, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-65 6-4).During the match, Sachko scored less points (11) than Andreozzi. In fact, the world no. 188 won 92 points vs Andreozzi’s. That means that Sachko was more focused during the important points. Sachko was quite aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sachko bagged 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Vitaliy Sachko lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Sachko put 66% of his first serves in, winning 79% (53/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Andreozzi once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Sachko has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (278-184). 22-11 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sachko has an aggregate172-112 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Bratislava 1 Challenger where he beat Dimitar Kuzmanov in the final 2-6 6-2 7-6(2).
Sachko has a composed 38-20 win-loss record in 2023, 22-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-20 | 3-7 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 250 (career-high), the Lebanese reached the 2nd round after beating Roman Andres Burruchaga 7-5 4-6 7-65.
In the 1st round, Hassan defeated Andres Burruchaga (7-5 4-6 7-65).During the match Hassan scored less points (4) than Andres Burruchaga. In fact, the world no. 188 won 103 points vs Andres Burruchaga’s. That means that Hassan was more focused during the important points. Hassan was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Hassan struck 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Benjamin Hassan lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Hassan put 55% of his first serves in, winning 67% (42/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (31/51) on the 2nd serve. Benjamin broke Andres Burruchaga 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Hassan’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Al Zahra,the Biel Challenger,the Florianopolis Challenger,the Blois Challenger and the Braunschweig Challenger.
Benjamin has a compiled 31-21 win-loss record in 2023, 21-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sachko | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 35 |
| Pts | 92-103 | 103-107 |
| Total Points | 195 | 210 |
| Winners | 53 | 42 |
| %Winners | 58% | 41% |
Both Sachko and Hassan played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Vitaliy Sachko lost 1 set, while Benjamin Hassan dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Sachko and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Sachko played 4 games less than Hassan. Sachko scored 53 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, The Lebanese blasted 42 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sachko | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
| 1st in | 67/102 | 63/114 |
| %1st in | 66% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 53/67 | 42/63 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 31/51 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 61% |
Sachko bagged 9 aces . Hassan scored 4 aces . Sachko won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sachko | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/5 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 20% | 60% |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 78% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Vitaliy broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Benjamin broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Hassan conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sachko | |||
| R1 Andreozzi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 92-103 | 92-103 | |
| Total points | 195 | 195 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 67/102 | 67/102 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 53/67 | 53/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 13/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hassan | |||
| R1 Andres |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 103-107 | 103-107 | |
| Total points | 210 | 210 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 63/114 | 63/114 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLLWLLL
LLWLLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Carlos TabernerTaberner (1-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (7-5 4-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Sumit NagalNagal (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Valentin RoyerRoyer (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (5-7 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-72 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Hugo GastonGaston (3-6 6-2 5-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (2-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Max HoukesHoukes (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (7-5 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Jiri VeselyVesely (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
