Rebecca Sramkova and Maddison Inglis will play each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Poland Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on Court 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maddison Inglis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maddison Inglis is the pick to win this match.
Maddison Inglis -> 1.87
Rebecca Sramkova -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebecca Sramkova vs. Maddison Inglis
This will be the 2nd time that Rebecca Sramkova and Maddison Inglis square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Inglis (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Inglis won 6-3 0-6 7-6(17) in the qualifications in at the Australian Open back in 2020.
Rebecca Sramkova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-12 | 5-5 | 12-6 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-25 | 10-7 | 22-9 | 11-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 3-5 | 13-11 | 8-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-22 | 7-7 | 13-9 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Rebecca reached the qualifications after beating Naiktha Bains 4-6 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications against Bains, Sramkova recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Sramkova and Bains scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 171 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Sramkova was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Sramkova was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and she was very solid in conceding no double faults. Rebecca Sramkova conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of her first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind her 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Sramkova has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 60% of her matches (300-200). 3-2 on hard in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sramkova has an overall42-39 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W25 Bath where she defeated Tereza Smitkova in the final 6-2 6-2 and the W40 Otocec where she defeated Seone Mendez in the final 6-3 7-6(2).
Sramkova has an aggregate 31-16 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Warsaw
Rebecca has never competed in this tournament before.
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-13 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, Inglis got to the qualifications after defeating Martyna Kubka 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, Inglis had a good straight sets win against Kubka (6-4 7-64). During the match Inglis and Kubka scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 171 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Australian was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Inglis wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Maddison Inglis conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of her first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W25 Osaka where she beat Na-Lae Han in the final 6-3 7-6(2).
The Australian has an aggregate 27-16 win-loss record in 2023, 15-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sramkova | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | 0% | 0% |
Both Sramkova and Inglis played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Rebecca Sramkova conceded 1 set while Maddison Inglis hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sramkova has played 1 set more than Inglis (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sramkova played 5 games more than Inglis. Sramkova scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sramkova | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 0% | 0% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 0% |
Sramkova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Inglis also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sramkova won 0% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 0% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sramkova | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 0% | 0% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Rebecca hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Sramkova had a solid display on her serve as she has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Maddison hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Australian was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Sramkova | |||
| Q1 Bains |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Inglis | |||
| Q1 Kubka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWW
LWWLLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Warsaw
- Carlos BerlocqBerlocq – Tommy RobredoRobredo (6-4 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Gastao EliasElias (6-2 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Renzo OlivoOlivo (7-69 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Natalija KosticKostic – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Maddison InglisInglis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Joanna GarlandGarland (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Valeria SavinykhSavinykh – Yuliya HatoukaHatouka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina KucovaKucova – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Heather WatsonWatson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Shuai ZhangZhang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Lin ZhuZhu (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Tatjana MariaMaria (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
