James McCabe and James Kent Trotter will face off in the quarter of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on COURT 8. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James McCabe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, James McCabe is the pick to win this match.
James McCabe -> 1.46
James Kent Trotter -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James McCabe vs. James Kent Trotter
There is no head to head record between James McCabe and James Kent Trotter since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
James McCabe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-19 | 18-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 288, James reached the quarter after defeating Tennys Sandgren 7-64 6-3 and Dane Sweeny 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, James had a good straight sets win against Sweeny (6-4 6-2). During the match, McCabe scored 59 points vs Sweeny’s 41. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, McCabe made 9 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. James McCabe was quite effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Sweeny 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
James hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
McCabe has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 61% of his matches (80-52). 19-8 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, McCabe has an overall66-32 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Bengaluru Challenger and the Puerto Vallarta Challenger.
The Australian has an aggregate 24-20 win-loss record in 2023, 19-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 11-7 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 579, Kent got to the quarter after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 7-65 6-4, Ezekiel Clark 7-5 6-4, Nathan Ponwith 6-3 7-61 and Thanasi Kokkinakis 7-65 2-0 ret..
In the 2nd round against Kokkinakis, the Japanese had a free pass after Kokkinakis retired on a 7-65 2-0 . scoreline.
James’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Wichita.
Kent has a composed 8-2 win-loss record in 2023, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 82 |
| Pts | 130-98 | 299-256 |
| Total Points | 228 | 555 |
| Winners | 51 | 140 |
| %Winners | 39% | 47% |
McCabe played 2 matches while Kent competed in 4 matches. Kent started his run from the qualifications while McCabe had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. McCabe has played 5 set(s) less than Kent (4 vs 9). Therefore, McCabe played 42 games less than Kent. James scored 51 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, James struck 140 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 51 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 12.8 |
| 1st in | 58/111 | 175/302 |
| %1st in | 52% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 51/58 | 140/175 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 34/53 | 57/127 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 45% |
McCabe fired 16 aces (8 per match). Kent recorded 51 aces (12.8 per match). McCabe won 88% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McCabe | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 8/22 |
| % Converted | 45% | 36% |
| Conceded | 1 | 27 |
| Saved | 0 | 24 |
| % Saved | 0% | 89% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
McCabe broke his opponents 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. James dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Kent broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. Kent conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
| McCabe | ||||
| R1 Sandgren |
R2 Sweeny |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| pts | 71-57 | 59-41 | 130-98 | |
| Total points | 128 | 100 | 228 | |
| Winners | 30 | 21 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/64 | 24/47 | 58/111 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 51% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 21/24 | 51/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/30 | 16/23 | 34/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 70% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/8 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 38% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Kent | ||||||
| Q1 Kirchheimer |
Q3 Clark |
R1 Ponwith |
R2 Kokkinakis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | 7-5 6-4 | 6-3 7-61 | 7-65 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 22 | 22 | 15 | 82 | |
| pts | 91-85 | 77-64 | 78-67 | 53-40 | 299-256 | |
| Total points | 176 | 141 | 145 | 93 | 555 | |
| Winners | 46 | 33 | 40 | 21 | 140 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 43% | 51% | 40% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 15 | 22 | 10 | 4 | 51 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 61/104 | 43/77 | 48/83 | 23/38 | 175/302 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 56% | 58% | 61% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/61 | 33/43 | 40/48 | 21/23 | 140/175 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 77% | 83% | 91% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/43 | 18/34 | 11/35 | 9/15 | 57/127 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 53% | 31% | 60% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 3/6 | 3/5 | 1/6 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 50% | 60% | 17% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 27 | |
| Saved | 11/11 | 4/5 | 9/11 | 0/0 | 24 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 82% | – | 131% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLLWLL
LWWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Granby Challenger
- Christian Harrison/Mikelis LibietisHarrison/Mikelis Libietis – Colin Sinclair/Dane SweenySinclair/Dane Sweeny (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
