Yanki Erel and Daniel Cukierman will play each other in the 2nd round of the Pozoblanco Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 7:00 pm on PISTA 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cukierman who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Cukierman is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Cukierman -> 1.87
Yanki Erel -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yanki Erel vs. Daniel Cukierman
There is no head to head record between Yanki Erel and Daniel Cukierman since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Yanki Erel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-15 | 12-10 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-25 | 44-18 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-21 | 27-14 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 20-7 | 11-11 | 14-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 355, Erel reached the 2nd round after beating Filip Peliwo 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Turk had a good straight sets win against Peliwo (6-1 6-1). During the match, Erel scored 54 points vs Peliwo’s 31. The Turk was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Erel scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Yanki Erel lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Erel put 48% of his first serves in, winning 86% (18/21) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Peliwo 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Erel has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (129-84). 28-10 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Erel has a composed76-33 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Erel’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Jakarta.
Yanki has an aggregate 32-15 win-loss record in 2023, 28-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pozoblanco Challenger
The Turk has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-11 | 2-2 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 402, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Alejandro Lopez Escribano 6-1 6-1, Ulises Blanch 6-4 6-4 and Nicolas Moreno De Alboran 6-4 7-66.
In the 1st round, The Israeli had a good straight sets win against Moreno De Alboran (6-4 7-66).During the match Cukierman scored less points (2) than Moreno De Alboran. In fact, the world no. 355 won 80 points vs Moreno De Alboran’s. That means that Cukierman was more focused during the important points. The Israeli was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Cukierman couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Cukierman conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Cukierman put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (47/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Daniel was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Moreno De Alboran once.
Cukierman’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Gurb.
The Israeli has a composed 23-16 win-loss record in 2023, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Erel | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 57 |
| Pts | 54-31 | 210-173 |
| Total Points | 85 | 383 |
| Winners | 18 | 105 |
| %Winners | 33% | 50% |
Erel played 1 match while Cukierman competed in 3 matches. Cukierman started his run from the qualifications while Erel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Erel has played 4 set(s) less than Cukierman (2 vs 6). Therefore, Erel played 43 games less than Cukierman. Yanki scored 18 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Israeli recorded 105 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Erel | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 21/44 | 140/208 |
| %1st in | 48% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 105/140 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 32/68 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 47% |
Erel managed to score 1 ace . Cukierman also made 4 aces (1.3 per match). Erel won 86% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Cukierman won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Erel | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 9 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 10 |
| % Saved | 80% | 91% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Erel broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Erel dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Cukierman broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve once and he saved 91% of the break points that he conceded.
| Erel | |||
| R1 Peliwo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 54-31 | 54-31 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 21/44 | 21/44 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Cukierman | |||||
| Q1 Lopez |
Q3 Blanch |
R1 Moreno De Alboran |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 20 | 23 | 57 | |
| pts | 53-26 | 77-65 | 80-82 | 210-173 | |
| Total points | 79 | 142 | 162 | 383 | |
| Winners | 22 | 36 | 47 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 47% | 59% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 25/39 | 48/73 | 67/96 | 140/208 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 66% | 70% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 36/48 | 47/67 | 105/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 75% | 70% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 11/25 | 14/29 | 32/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 44% | 48% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 3/12 | 1/1 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 25% | 100% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/7 | 4/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 86% | 100% | 186% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWL
LLLWLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Pozoblanco Challenger
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Daniel MasurMasur (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (7-62 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dan AddedAdded – Mattia BellucciBellucci (7-64 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Yanki ErelErel – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (1-1) – H2H and prediction
