Dominic Thiem and Hamad Medjedovic will face off in the 2nd round of the EFG Swiss Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on ROY EMERSON ARENA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Thiem who should win in 3 sets.
Dominic Thiem -> 1.58
Hamad Medjedovic -> 2.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dominic Thiem vs. Hamad Medjedovic
This will be the 2nd time that Dominic Thiem and Hamad Medjedovic play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Medjedovic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Medjedovic won 7-6(3) 6-2 in the semifinal in the Mauthausen Challenger back in May 2023.
Dominic Thiem
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-30 | 1-5 | 18-15 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-19 | 2-2 | 8-11 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-9 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-9 | 14-4 | 6-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, Thiem got to the 2nd round after defeating Alexandre Muller 6-1 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Muller (6-1 7-64). During the match, Thiem scored 70 points vs Muller’s 59. Dominic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Thiem managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Dominic Thiem conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Thiem put 68% of his first serves in, winning 76% (38/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Thiem broke Muller twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Thiem has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (357-200). 13-12 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Thiem has an aggregate 169-71 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Austrian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Mauthausen Challenger.
Dominic has an overall 13-20 win-loss record in 2023, 13-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Gstaad
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-21 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-21 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, Medjedovic reached the 2nd round after defeating Federico Gaio 6-3 7-64, Otto Virtanen 7-65 6-4 and Zhizhen Zhang 4-6 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round against Zhang, The Serbian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-4). During the match Medjedovic scored 93 points vs Zhang’s 84. The Serbian was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Medjedovic made 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Medjedovic put 54% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. Medjedovic broke Zhang 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Szekesfehervar Challenger where he defeated Nino Serdarusic in the final 6-4 6-3 and the Mauthausen Challenger where he overcame Filip Misolic in the final 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4.
The Serbian has an overall 30-14 win-loss record in 2023, 18-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Gstaad
The Serbian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thiem | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 72 |
| Pts | 70-59 | 247-218 |
| Total Points | 129 | 465 |
| Winners | 38 | 113 |
| %Winners | 54% | 46% |
Thiem played 1 match while Medjedovic competed in 3 matches. Medjedovic started his run from the qualifications while Thiem had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Hamad Medjedovic lost 1 set while Dominic Thiem hasn’t lost a set so far. Thiem has played 5 set(s) less than Medjedovic (2 vs 7). Therefore, Thiem played 52 games less than Medjedovic. Thiem scored 38 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian fired 113 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thiem | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 6 |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 146/236 |
| %1st in | 68% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 38/50 | 113/146 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 47/90 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 52% |
Thiem managed to score 9 aces . Medjedovic fired 18 aces (6 per match). Thiem won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thiem | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 9/20 |
| % Converted | 67% | 45% |
| Conceded | 4 | 20 |
| Saved | 4 | 15 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Thiem broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Thiem very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. Medjedovic broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Thiem | |||
| R1 Muller | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-59 | 70-59 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 50/74 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 38/50 | 38/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Medjedovic | |||||
| Q1 Gaio | Q3 Virtanen | R1 Zhang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | 7-65 6-4 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 23 | 27 | 72 | |
| pts | 73-60 | 81-74 | 93-84 | 247-218 | |
| Total points | 133 | 155 | 177 | 465 | |
| Winners | 32 | 48 | 33 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 59% | 35% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 5 | 3 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 57/79 | 47/87 | 146/236 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 72% | 54% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 48/57 | 33/47 | 113/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 84% | 70% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 10/22 | 20/40 | 47/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 45% | 50% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 1/6 | 5/8 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 17% | 63% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 | 8 | 20 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 7/7 | 5/8 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 100% | 63% | 223% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Gstaad
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Arthur FilsFils (7-64 7-64) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Taro DanielDaniel (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-1 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Dominic Stricker/Stan WawrinkaStricker/Stan Wawrinka – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Laslo DjereDjere (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Zizou Bergs/Jurij RodionovBergs/Jurij Rodionov – Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (4-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Taro DanielDaniel (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-1 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Fabio FogniniFognini (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Arthur FilsFils (7-6(4) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Facundo BagnisBagnis (4-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jurij RodionovRodionov (2-1) – H2H and prediction