Li Tu and Illya Marchenko will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Infosys Hall of Fame Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Illya Marchenko who should win in 3 sets.
Illya Marchenko -> 1.8
Li Tu -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Li Tu vs. Illya Marchenko
There is no head to head record between Li Tu and Illya Marchenko since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Li Tu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-23 | 11-17 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-28 | 37-21 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, the Australian reached the qualifications after defeating Matija Pecotic 6-3 6-74 6-2.
In the qualifications, Tu defeated Pecotic (6-3 6-74 6-2). During the match, Tu scored 106 points vs Pecotic’s 82. Tu was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tu struck 3 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Li Tu lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 52% of his first serves in, winning 84% (41/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. Tu broke Pecotic 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Tu has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 68% of his matches (108-50). 4-3 on grass in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tu has a composed4-4 win-loss record in the last 4 years on grass.
Li’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Tu has an overall 17-17 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Li has never competed in this tournament before.
Illya Marchenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-22 | 6-13 | 0-1 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-22 | 17-5 | 6-6 | 18-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-25 | 9-10 | 3-4 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-28 | 5-7 | 2-5 | 26-12 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after beating Donald Young 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Marchenko had a good straight sets win against Young (6-1 6-3). During the match Marchenko scored 60 points vs Young’s 42. Marchenko was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Marchenko fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Illya Marchenko lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Marchenko put 56% of his first serves in, winning 74% (23/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Illya broke Young 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Illya’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Puerto Vallarta Challenger.
Illya has a compiled 21-13 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tu | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 16 |
| Pts | 106-82 | 60-42 |
| Total Points | 188 | 102 |
| Winners | 41 | 23 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Both Tu and Marchenko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Li Tu lost 1 set while Illya Marchenko hasn’t lost a set so far. Tu has played 1 set more than Marchenko (3 vs 2). Therefore, Tu played 14 games more than Marchenko. Li scored 41 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian managed to score 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tu | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 49/94 | 31/55 |
| %1st in | 52% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 41/49 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 12/24 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 50% |
Tu recorded 3 aces . Marchenko made 3 aces . Tu won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Marchenko won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tu | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 56% |
| Conceded | 9 | 5 |
| Saved | 7 | 4 |
| % Saved | 78% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Tu broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Tu conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Illya broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tu | |||
| Q1 Pecotic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-74 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 106-82 | 106-82 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 49/94 | 49/94 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 41/49 | 41/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Marchenko | |||
| Q1 Young | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-42 | 60-42 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/55 | 31/55 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Yunseong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Alex BoltBolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Evan ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Jaimee Floyd AngelFloyd Angel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Kevin AndersonAnderson (0-0) – H2H and prediction