Michael Vrbensky and Simon Beaupain will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Amersfoort Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on KNLTB COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Vrbensky who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Vrbensky is the pick to win this match.
Michael Vrbensky -> 1.184
Simon Beaupain -> 4.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Vrbensky vs. Simon Beaupain
There is no head to head record between Michael Vrbensky and Simon Beaupain since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Michael Vrbensky
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-24 | 4-3 | 32-18 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 11-6 | 44-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-27 | 7-3 | 37-16 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 17-24 | 2-1 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-15 | 2-2 | 14-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 350, Michael got to the qualifications after beating Maxime Mora 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Vrbensky had a good straight sets win against Mora (6-3 6-4). During the match, Vrbensky scored 79 points vs Mora’s 69. Michael was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vrbensky blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Michael Vrbensky lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Vrbensky put 69% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. Michael broke Mora 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Vrbensky has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (218-144). 18-12 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vrbensky has a composed147-94 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Czech’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio,M25 Faro and M25 Most.
The Czech has an overall 29-18 win-loss record in 2023, 18-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Simon Beaupain
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-24 | 7-7 | 18-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-26 | 8-7 | 11-14 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-20 | 14-5 | 20-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-23 | 8-6 | 26-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-15 | 8-9 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 583, Beaupain got to the qualifications after beating Fons Van Sambeek 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Simon had a good straight sets win against Van Sambeek (6-4 6-2). During the match Beaupain scored 69 points vs Van Sambeek’s 52. Simon was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Beaupain bagged 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Simon Beaupain was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Simon broke Van Sambeek 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Beaupain has an overall 9-18 win-loss record in 2023, 6-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vrbensky | Beaupain |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 79-69 | 69-52 |
| Total Points | 148 | 121 |
| Winners | 31 | 28 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Both Vrbensky and Beaupain played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vrbensky and Beaupain have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vrbensky played 1 game more than Beaupain. Michael scored 31 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Simon managed to score 28 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vrbensky | Beaupain |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 38/56 |
| %1st in | 69% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 31/47 | 28/38 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 10/18 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 56% |
Vrbensky scored 6 aces . Beaupain made 4 aces . Vrbensky won 66% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Beaupain won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vrbensky | Beaupain |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 33% | 44% |
| Conceded | 9 | 5 |
| Saved | 8 | 4 |
| % Saved | 89% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Michael broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Vrbensky conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vrbensky | |||
| Q1 Mora |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 79-69 | 79-69 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 47/68 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/47 | 31/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Beaupain | |||
| Q1 Van |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-52 | 69-52 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/56 | 38/56 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLLWW
LLWWWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Aleksandr BrayninBraynin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Steven DiezDiez (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Simon BeaupainBeaupain (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tibo ColsonColson – Denys KlokKlok (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
