Kyrian Jacquet and Andrey Chepelev will square off in the qualifications of the Trieste Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kyrian Jacquet who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kyrian Jacquet is the pick to win this match.
Kyrian Jacquet -> 1.48
Andrey Chepelev -> 2.51
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kyrian Jacquet vs. Andrey Chepelev
There is no head to head record between Kyrian Jacquet and Andrey Chepelev since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Kyrian Jacquet
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-9 | 2-2 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-22 | 11-5 | 27-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-25 | 9-5 | 19-13 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-28 | 1-3 | 19-14 | 14-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 339, Kyrian reached the qualifications after beating Aldin Setkic 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jacquet had a good straight sets win against Setkic (6-2 6-1). During the match, Jacquet scored 59 points vs Setkic’s 32. Jacquet was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jacquet scored 2 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Kyrian Jacquet was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (20/26) of his 1st serve and 82% (14/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kyrian broke Setkic 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Jacquet has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (140-108). 20-9 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jacquet has a compiled70-46 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Blois Challenger.
Kyrian has a compiled 23-12 win-loss record in 2023, 20-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Trieste Challenger
Jacquet has never competed in this tournament before.
Andrey Chepelev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 70-43 | 1-2 | 69-41 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 67-38 | 0-0 | 67-37 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-34 | 2-3 | 36-29 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 431, Andrey reached the qualifications after beating Simone Agostini 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Andrey had a good straight sets win against Agostini (6-1 6-3). During the match Chepelev scored 59 points vs Agostini’s 36. The Russian was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Chepelev managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Andrey Chepelev conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Chepelev put 68% of his first serves in, winning 87% (26/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Chepelev broke Agostini 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Andrey’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
The Russian has an overall 45-25 win-loss record in 2023, 44-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Trieste Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jacquet | Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 59-32 | 59-36 |
| Total Points | 91 | 95 |
| Winners | 20 | 26 |
| %Winners | 34% | 44% |
Both Jacquet and Chepelev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jacquet and Chepelev have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jacquet played 1 game less than Chepelev. Jacquet scored 20 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Chepelev managed to score 26 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jacquet | Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 30/44 |
| %1st in | 60% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 26/30 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 7/14 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 50% |
Jacquet recorded 2 aces . Chepelev struck 3 aces . Jacquet won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Chepelev won 87% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jacquet | Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 80% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Kyrian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jacquet very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Chepelev broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Russian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Jacquet | |||
| Q1 Setkic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-32 | 59-32 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 20/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/17 | 14/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Chepelev | |||
| Q1 Agostini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-36 | 59-36 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWL
LWWLWLLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Emilien VoisinVoisin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Hugo GastonGaston (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
