Ezekiel Clark and James Kent Trotter will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 3 sets.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.5
Ezekiel Clark -> 2.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ezekiel Clark vs. James Kent Trotter
There is no head to head record between Ezekiel Clark and James Kent Trotter since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ezekiel Clark
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-26 | 17-20 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 20-16 | 1-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-33 | 37-22 | 5-5 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 17-14 | 4-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 476, Ezekiel reached the qualifications after defeating Jaden Weekes 7-5 2-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Clark defeated Weekes (7-5 2-6 7-5). During the match, Clark scored 106 points vs Weekes’s 105. Clark was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Clark scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 6 double faults. Ezekiel Clark lost the serve 7 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Clark put 61% of his first serves in, winning 60% (37/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (19/40) on the 2nd serve. Ezekiel broke Weekes 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).
Clark has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (137-105). 15-10 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Clark has a composed111-75 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Clark’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Tacarigua and M15 Tabasco.
The American has a compiled 22-17 win-loss record in 2023, 15-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-22 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 18-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 573, James got to the qualifications after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 7-65 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kent had a good straight sets win against Kirchheimer (7-65 6-4). During the match Kent scored 91 points vs Kirchheimer’s 85. Kent was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Kent recorded 15 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. James Kent Trotter conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 11 break points. Furthermore, Kent put 59% of his first serves in, winning 75% (46/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (19/43) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Kirchheimer once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
The Japanese’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Wichita.
Kent has a composed 5-2 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Kent has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Clark | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 23 |
| Pts | 106-105 | 91-85 |
| Total Points | 211 | 176 |
| Winners | 37 | 46 |
| %Winners | 35% | 51% |
Both Clark and Kent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ezekiel Clark conceded 1 set while James Kent Trotter hasn’t dropped a set so far. Clark has played 1 set more than Kent (3 vs 2). Therefore, Clark played 9 games more than Kent. The American scored 37 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, James bagged 46 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Clark | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 15 |
| 1st in | 62/102 | 61/104 |
| %1st in | 61% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 37/62 | 46/61 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/43 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 44% |
Clark fired 1 ace . Kent also scored 15 aces . Clark won 60% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Clark | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 1 |
| Converted | 7/16 | 1/5 |
| % Converted | 44% | 20% |
| Conceded | 17 | 11 |
| Saved | 10 | 11 |
| % Saved | 59% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. James was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 11 break points.
| Clark | |||
| Q1 Weekes | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 106-105 | 106-105 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 62/102 | 62/102 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 37/62 | 37/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 10/17 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 59% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
| Kent | |||
| Q1 Kirchheimer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 91-85 | 91-85 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 61/104 | 61/104 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 46/61 | 46/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/43 | 19/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 11/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Christian HarrisonHarrison (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Jason JungJung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Nathan PonwithPonwith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua SheehySheehy – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction