Nick Chappell and Alexander Cozbinov will play each other in the qualifications of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nick Chappell who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nick Chappell is the pick to win this match.
Nick Chappell -> 1.55
Alexander Cozbinov -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nick Chappell vs. Alexander Cozbinov
There is no head to head record between Nick Chappell and Alexander Cozbinov since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-26 | 19-18 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 342, Chappell got to the qualifications after beating Keegan Rice 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Nick had a good straight sets win against Rice (6-1 6-3). During the match, Chappell scored 64 points vs Rice’s 40. Nick was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chappell fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Nick Chappell conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 63% of his first serves in, winning 83% (30/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Rice 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Chappell has positive record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (185-179). 21-10 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Chappell has a composed 123-85 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Nick’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Tulsa.
The American has an overall 26-19 win-loss record in 2023, 21-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Alexander Cozbinov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-35 | 36-29 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 31-15 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-27 | 15-12 | 6-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, Alexander reached the qualifications after defeating Dan Martin 1-6 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications against Martin, Alexander recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-4 6-1). During the match Cozbinov scored 77 points vs Martin’s 71. The Moldovan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Cozbinov scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alexander Cozbinov lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cozbinov put 57% of his first serves in, winning 74% (25/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. The Moldovan broke Martin 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
The Moldovan’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Cozbinov has an aggregate 24-15 win-loss record in 2023, 23-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Alexander has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chappell | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 24 |
| Pts | 64-40 | 77-71 |
| Total Points | 104 | 148 |
| Winners | 30 | 25 |
| %Winners | 47% | 32% |
Both Chappell and Cozbinov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexander Cozbinov conceded 1 set while Nick Chappell hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Chappell has played 1 set(s) less than Cozbinov (2 vs 3). Therefore, Chappell played 8 games less than Cozbinov. The American scored 30 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Moldovan managed to score 25 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chappell | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 34/60 |
| %1st in | 63% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 30/36 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 12/26 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 46% |
Chappell made 3 aces . Cozbinov blasted 4 aces . Chappell won 83% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Cozbinov won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chappell | Cozbinov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 67% | 36% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 20% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Nick broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points. The Moldovan broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Moldovan conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 20% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chappell | |||
| Q1 Rice |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 64-40 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/36 | 30/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cozbinov | |||
| Q1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 77-71 | 77-71 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/60 | 34/60 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWWW
LLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Christian HarrisonHarrison (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Jason JungJung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Nathan PonwithPonwith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua SheehySheehy – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
