Patrick Kypson and Nathan Ponwith will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Granby Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.33
Nathan Ponwith -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Nathan Ponwith
This will be the 2nd time that Patrick Kypson and Nathan Ponwith square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Kypson won 6-4 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Champaign back in 2022.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-20 | 6-9 | 4-7 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after beating Tristan Mccormick 7-65 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kypson had a good straight sets win against Mccormick (7-65 6-2). During the match, Kypson scored 76 points vs Mccormick’s 60. Patrick was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kypson scored 3 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Patrick Kypson was exceptionally effective on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 76% (19/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Patrick broke Mccormick twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Kypson has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 65% of his matches (161-88). 2-3 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kypson has a composed55-38 record in the last 9 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Medellin Challenger where he beat Benjamin Lock in the final 6-3 6-3.
Kypson has a composed 22-11 win-loss record in 2023, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Kypson has never competed in this tournament before.
Nathan Ponwith
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-23 | 15-18 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-32 | 18-25 | 2-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-27 | 19-15 | 6-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-14 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392, the American got to the qualifications after beating Marko Stakusic 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Nathan had a good straight sets win against Stakusic (6-4 6-4). During the match Ponwith scored 61 points vs Stakusic’s 49. Nathan was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Ponwith blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nathan Ponwith was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Stakusic twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Ponwith’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Wesley Chapel and M25 Calabasas.
Nathan has an aggregate 19-15 win-loss record in 2023, 15-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 20 |
| Pts | 76-60 | 61-49 |
| Total Points | 136 | 110 |
| Winners | 28 | 27 |
| %Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Kypson and Ponwith played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kypson and Ponwith have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kypson played 1 game more than Ponwith. The American scored 28 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Nathan bagged 27 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 32/49 |
| %1st in | 58% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 27/32 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 19/25 | 13/17 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 76% |
Kypson fired 3 aces . Ponwith fired 3 aces . Kypson won 82% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Ponwith won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The American quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Ponwith was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Kypson | |||
| Q1 Mccormick |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-60 | 76-60 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 34/59 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ponwith | |||
| Q1 Stakusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 61-49 | 61-49 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/49 | 32/49 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWLWL
LLLLLLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Christian HarrisonHarrison (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Jason JungJung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Nathan PonwithPonwith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua SheehySheehy – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
