Tristan Schoolkate and Ethan Quinn will square off in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.78
Ethan Quinn -> 1.952
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-17 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 326, the Australian got to the 2nd round after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 6-1, Christian Langmo 6-3 1-6 7-5 and Altug Celikbilek 6-4 7-62.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (6-4 7-62). During the match, Schoolkate scored 70 points vs Celikbilek’s 63. Tristan was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate made 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Schoolkate put 68% of his first serves in, winning 79% (37/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Schoolkate broke Celikbilek 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Schoolkate has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (115-76). 21-13 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has an aggregate63-45 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 33-18 win-loss record in 2023, 21-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Schoolkate has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-19 | 10-8 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477, Ethan got to the 2nd round after defeating Ernesto Escobedo 7-66 0-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Quinn defeated Escobedo (7-66 0-6 6-4).During the match Quinn scored less points (6) than Escobedo. In fact, the world no. 326 won 82 points vs Escobedo’s. That means that Quinn was more focused during the important points. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn blasted 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 60% of his first serves in, winning 75% (40/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 31% (11/35) on the 2nd serve. Ethan broke Escobedo 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Quinn’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Quinn has an overall 8-2 win-loss record in 2023, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 29 |
| Pts | 226-189 | 82-88 |
| Total Points | 415 | 170 |
| Winners | 108 | 40 |
| %Winners | 48% | 49% |
Schoolkate played 3 matches while Quinn competed in 1 match. Schoolkate started his run from the qualifications while Quinn had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Tristan Schoolkate conceded 1 set, while Ethan Quinn surrendered 1 set. Schoolkate has played 4 sets more than Quinn (7 vs 3). Therefore, Schoolkate played 39 games more than Quinn. The Australian scored 108 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 40 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 9 |
| 1st in | 145/202 | 53/88 |
| %1st in | 72% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 108/145 | 40/53 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 30/57 | 11/35 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 31% |
Schoolkate bagged 15 aces (5 per match). Quinn blasted 9 aces . Schoolkate won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 31% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 3 |
| Converted | 11/23 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 48% | 43% |
| Conceded | 11 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 45% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 5 |
Schoolkate broke his opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Schoolkate dropped his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||||
| Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Q3 Langmo |
R1 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | 6-4 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 28 | 23 | 68 | |
| pts | 66-41 | 90-85 | 70-63 | 226-189 | |
| Total points | 107 | 175 | 133 | 415 | |
| Winners | 29 | 42 | 37 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 47% | 53% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 9 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 34/48 | 64/85 | 47/69 | 145/202 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 75% | 68% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 42/64 | 37/47 | 108/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 66% | 79% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 12/21 | 10/22 | 30/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | 45% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/9 | 3/4 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 44% | 75% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 3 | 11 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 3/7 | 1/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 43% | 33% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Quinn | |||||
| R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 0-6 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |||
| pts | 82-88 | 82-88 | |||
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |||
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |||
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |||
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |||
| 1st in | 53/88 | 53/88 | |||
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |||
| 1st pts | 40/53 | 40/53 | |||
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |||
| 2nd pts | 11/35 | 11/35 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 31% | 31% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |||
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |||
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |||
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |||
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |||
| Saved % | 38% | 13% | |||
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWWWL
LWWWLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Steve JohnsonJohnson (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Li TuTu (7-63 6-75 7-65) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Dane SweenySweeny (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (7-65 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-66 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Emilio GomezGomez (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Yunseong ChungChung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
