![Prediction And Head To Head Omar Jasika Vs. Colin Sinclair 9taw7ajgot Prediction and head to head Omar Jasika vs. Colin Sinclair](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Omar-Jasika-vs.-Colin-Sinclair-9Taw7aJGOT.jpg)
Omar Jasika and Colin Sinclair will face off in the qualifications of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Omar Jasika who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Omar Jasika is the pick to win this match.
Omar Jasika -> 1.62
Colin Sinclair -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omar Jasika vs. Colin Sinclair
There is no head to head record between Omar Jasika and Colin Sinclair since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Omar Jasika
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-18 | 17-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-26 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 70-23 | 63-20 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 286, the Australian reached the qualifications after defeating Quinn Vandecasteele 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jasika had a good straight sets win against Vandecasteele (7-5 6-1). During the match, Jasika scored 74 points vs Vandecasteele’s 56. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jasika scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Omar Jasika lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jasika put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. Jasika broke Vandecasteele 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Jasika has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (179-105). 19-8 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Jasika has an overall143-77 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Jasika’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Jakarta.
The Australian has a compiled 22-13 win-loss record in 2023, 19-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Omar has never competed in this tournament before.
Colin Sinclair
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-32 | 31-25 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-22 | 22-14 | 7-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 39-21 | 22-8 | 14-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-12 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 381, Colin got to the qualifications after beating Strong Kirchheimer 7-65 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Kirchheimer (7-65 6-4). During the match Sinclair scored 79 points vs Kirchheimer’s 68. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Sinclair blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Colin Sinclair was very efficient on serve to win 80% (41/51) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Colin broke Kirchheimer once after converting 10% of his break points (1/10).
Sinclair’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
The Australian has an aggregate 25-16 win-loss record in 2023, 17-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Jasika | Sinclair |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 23 |
Pts | 74-56 | 79-68 |
Total Points | 130 | 147 |
Winners | 31 | 41 |
%Winners | 42% | 52% |
Both Jasika and Sinclair played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jasika and Sinclair have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jasika played 4 games less than Sinclair. Omar scored 31 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Colin struck 41 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Jasika | Sinclair |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 10 |
Avg per match | 1 | 10 |
1st in | 44/66 | 51/71 |
%1st in | 67% | 72% |
1st pts | 31/44 | 41/51 |
%1st pts | 70% | 80% |
2nd pts | 8/22 | 13/20 |
%2nd pts | 36% | 65% |
Jasika scored 1 ace . Sinclair also made 10 aces . Jasika won 70% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Sinclair won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Jasika | Sinclair |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 1 |
Converted | 6/13 | 1/10 |
% Converted | 46% | 10% |
Conceded | 8 | 2 |
Saved | 5 | 2 |
% Saved | 63% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Omar broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Jasika conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent once with a 10% conversion rate. The Australian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Jasika | |||
Q1 Vandecasteele |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 74-56 | 74-56 | |
Total points | 130 | 130 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 44/66 | 44/66 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Sinclair | |||
Q1 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 79-68 | 79-68 | |
Total points | 147 | 147 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 52% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 51/71 | 51/71 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 41/51 | 41/51 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/10 | 1/10 | |
Converted % | 10% | 10% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction