Dmitry Popko and Giovanni Oradini will face off in the qualifications of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dmitry Popko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dmitry Popko is the pick to win this match.
Dmitry Popko -> 1.78
Giovanni Oradini -> 1.952
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dmitry Popko vs. Giovanni Oradini
There is no head to head record between Dmitry Popko and Giovanni Oradini since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dmitry Popko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-31 | 15-11 | 8-17 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 64-33 | 7-2 | 57-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-20 | 1-1 | 38-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-30 | 11-11 | 7-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-34 | 0-4 | 27-19 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 343, Dmitry reached the qualifications after defeating Alessio Balestrieri 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Popko had a good straight sets win against Balestrieri (6-0 6-1). During the match, Popko scored 60 points vs Balestrieri’s 32. The Kazakhstani was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Popko managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Dmitry Popko lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Popko put 47% of his first serves in, winning 90% (18/20) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. Popko broke Balestrieri 7 times after converting 64% of his break points (7/11).
Popko has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (382-234). 21-11 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Popko has a compiled 237-129 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Pensacola.
Dmitry has an aggregate 21-11 win-loss record in 2023, 21-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Giovanni Oradini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-29 | 2-3 | 26-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-28 | 1-3 | 19-20 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-33 | 5-6 | 32-19 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 62-30 | 27-11 | 25-11 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-10 | 13-5 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 432, Giovanni got to the qualifications after defeating Carlos Taberner 6-72 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Taberner, Giovanni recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-3 6-3). During the match Oradini scored 97 points vs Taberner’s 95. Oradini was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Oradini scored 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Giovanni Oradini lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Oradini put 57% of his first serves in, winning 70% (40/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (20/43) on the 2nd serve. Oradini broke Taberner 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Oradini’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Giovanni has an aggregate 19-22 win-loss record in 2023, 13-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Popko | Oradini |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 31 |
| Pts | 60-32 | 97-95 |
| Total Points | 92 | 192 |
| Winners | 18 | 40 |
| %Winners | 30% | 41% |
Both Popko and Oradini played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Giovanni Oradini lost 1 set while Dmitry Popko hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Popko has played 1 set(s) less than Oradini (2 vs 3). Therefore, Popko played 18 games less than Oradini. Dmitry scored 18 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian managed to score 40 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Popko | Oradini |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 20/43 | 57/100 |
| %1st in | 47% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 18/20 | 40/57 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 20/43 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 47% |
Popko blasted 8 aces . Oradini made 4 aces . Popko won 90% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Oradini won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Popko | Oradini |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/11 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 64% | 55% |
| Conceded | 8 | 9 |
| Saved | 7 | 6 |
| % Saved | 88% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Dmitry dropped his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Popko | |||
| Q1 Balestrieri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 60-32 | 60-32 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 20/43 | 20/43 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 18/20 | 18/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Oradini | |||
| Q1 Taberner |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 97-95 | 97-95 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 57/100 | 57/100 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 40/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/43 | 20/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWLW
LLWWLLLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Pablo CuevasCuevas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Federico GaioGaio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Remy BertolaBertola (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
