Emilio Nava and Moez Echargui will face off in the semifinal of the Modena Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 9:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.34
Moez Echargui -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Moez Echargui
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Moez Echargui since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, Nava reached the semifinal after defeating Elmar Ejupovic 6-75 6-4 6-3, Daniel Michalski 6-2 6-2 and Gianmarco Ferrari 6-1 6-75 6-2.
In the quarter, The American defeated Ferrari (6-1 6-75 6-2). During the match, Nava scored 99 points vs Ferrari’s 76. Emilio was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Emilio Nava lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (39/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 73% (19/26) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Ferrari 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Emilio has surrendered 2 set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Nava has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (131-87). 10-8 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has an aggregate59-28 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Emilio has a composed 18-18 win-loss record in 2023, 10-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Modena Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Moez Echargui
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-17 | 9-10 | 2-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-34 | 23-10 | 23-22 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 7-2 | 37-26 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-24 | 38-17 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-14 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 310, the Tunisian reached the semifinal after beating Oliver Crawford 6-4 7-5, Thiago Moura Monteiro 3-6 6-1 6-2 and Terence Atmane 7-67 4-6 6-2.
In the quarter, The Tunisian defeated Atmane (7-67 4-6 6-2). During the match Echargui scored 113 points vs Atmane’s 107. The Tunisian was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Echargui managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Moez Echargui was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (43/57) of his 1st serve and 52% (23/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Tunisian broke Atmane 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Moez has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Echargui’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Monastir.
Echargui has a composed 29-14 win-loss record in 2023, 12-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 76 | 77 |
| Pts | 257-195 | 268-233 |
| Total Points | 452 | 501 |
| Winners | 106 | 104 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Both Nava and Echargui played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emilio Nava conceded 2 sets, while Moez Echargui conceded 2 sets. Talking about their workload, Nava and Echargui have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Nava played 1 game less than Echargui. Emilio scored 106 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Tunisian struck 104 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 7.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 138/209 | 137/244 |
| %1st in | 66% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 106/138 | 104/137 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 48/71 | 61/107 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 57% |
Nava made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Echargui fired 18 aces (6 per match). Nava won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Echargui won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Echargui |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 10 |
| Converted | 14/32 | 10/29 |
| % Converted | 44% | 34% |
| Conceded | 8 | 13 |
| Saved | 6 | 9 |
| % Saved | 75% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Emilio broke his opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Emilio dropped his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Echargui broke his opponents 10 times with a 34% conversion rate. Moez conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||||
| R1 Ejupovic |
R2 Michalski |
1/4 Ferrari |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-1 6-75 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 16 | 28 | 76 | |
| pts | 103-88 | 55-31 | 99-76 | 257-195 | |
| Total points | 191 | 86 | 175 | 452 | |
| Winners | 43 | 24 | 39 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% | 39% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | 5 | 6 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 29/42 | 56/82 | 138/209 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 69% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 43/53 | 24/29 | 39/56 | 106/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 83% | 70% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 9/13 | 19/26 | 48/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 69% | 73% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/7 | 6/14 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 57% | 43% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 1/1 | 2/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 67% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Echargui | |||||
| R1 Crawford |
R2 Moura Monteiro |
1/4 Atmane |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | 7-67 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 24 | 31 | 77 | |
| pts | 75-60 | 80-66 | 113-107 | 268-233 | |
| Total points | 135 | 146 | 220 | 501 | |
| Winners | 28 | 33 | 43 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 5 | 2 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 36/67 | 44/76 | 57/101 | 137/244 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 58% | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 33/44 | 43/57 | 104/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 75% | 75% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 20/32 | 23/44 | 61/107 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 63% | 52% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/9 | 3/12 | 10/29 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 44% | 25% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 6 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 2/3 | 4/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 67% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLLW
LLLWLLWLLL Tennis Scores in Modena Challenger
- Nerman FaticFatic – Federico CoriaCoria (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Terence AtmaneAtmane (7-67 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Gianmarco FerrariFerrari (6-1 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Federico CoriaCoria (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
