Dayana Yastremska and Celine Naef will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on Court 9. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dayana Yastremska who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dayana Yastremska is the pick to win this match.
Dayana Yastremska -> 1.64
Celine Naef -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dayana Yastremska vs. Celine Naef
There is no head to head record between Dayana Yastremska and Celine Naef since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dayana Yastremska
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-13 | 12-6 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-29 | 19-13 | 12-9 | 5-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-25 | 7-11 | 5-4 | 7-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-12 | 3-8 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 152, Dayana got to the qualifications after defeating Kimberly Birrell 6-4 6-3 and Erika Andreeva 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Andreeva (6-3 6-4). During the match, Yastremska scored 69 points vs Andreeva’s 55. Yastremska was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Yastremska bagged 3 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Dayana Yastremska lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Yastremska put 60% of her first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Yastremska broke Andreeva 3 times after converting 38% of her break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Yastremska started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points she played.
Yastremska has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of her matches (193-135). 3-2 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Yastremska has a compiled20-16 win-loss record in the last 8 years on grass.
Yastremska’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Reus.
The Ukrainian has a compiled 23-18 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Celine Naef
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-18 | 3-2 | 3-4 | 10-7 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 165 (career-high), the Swiss got to the qualifications after defeating Kristina Dmitruk 7-63 6-0 and Ashlyn Krueger 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-4 6-2). During the match Naef scored 64 points vs Krueger’s 49. Naef was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Naef fired 5 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Celine Naef lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Naef put 58% of her first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind her 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Krueger 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Celine started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points she played.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W25 Loughborough where she beat Eliz Maloney in the final 6-0 6-4 and the W40 Porto where she defeated Lucrezia Stefanini in the final 6-2 6-4.
Naef has a compiled 32-8 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Yastremska | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 37 |
| Pts | 143-114 | 132-97 |
| Total Points | 257 | 229 |
| Winners | 54 | 55 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Both Yastremska and Naef played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Yastremska and Naef have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Yastremska played 1 game more than Naef. The Ukrainian scored 54 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss bagged 55 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Yastremska | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 69/134 | 77/125 |
| %1st in | 51% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 54/69 | 55/77 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 36/65 | 25/48 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 52% |
Yastremska recorded 10 aces (5 per match). Naef recorded 9 aces (4.5 per match). Yastremska won 78% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Naef won 71% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Yastremska | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 8 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 8/15 |
| % Converted | 46% | 53% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 7 | 4 |
| % Saved | 78% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Ukrainian broke her opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Ukrainian dropped her serve twice and she saved 78% of the break points that she conceded. Celine broke her opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Yastremska | ||||
| Q1 Birrell |
Q2 Andreeva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 69-55 | 143-114 | |
| Total points | 133 | 124 | 257 | |
| Winners | 23 | 31 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 45% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 31/71 | 38/63 | 69/134 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 60% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 31/38 | 54/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 82% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/40 | 12/25 | 36/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 48% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/8 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 38% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 3/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 75% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Naef | ||||
| Q1 Dmitruk |
Q2 Krueger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-0 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 | 37 | |
| pts | 68-48 | 64-49 | 132-97 | |
| Total points | 116 | 113 | 229 | |
| Winners | 31 | 24 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 35/60 | 77/125 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 58% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 24/35 | 55/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 69% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 15/25 | 25/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 60% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/10 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 40% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 75% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLLWWLWL
LLLWLLLLLW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Fernando YamacitaYamacita (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Juan Ignacio IlievIgnacio Iliev (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Geronimo Espin BusleimanEspin Busleiman – Leonardo AboianAboian (6-1 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Nicolas BacellaBacella (6-2 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Alexandre TsuchiyaTsuchiya (4-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carlos Eduardo SeverinoEduardo Severino – Nicolas BianchiBianchi (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Storm SandersSanders – Nao HibinoHibino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BroganBrogan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Sofia KeninKenin (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Kaja JuvanJuvan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
