Carol Zhao and Coco Vandeweghe will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on Court 14. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Coco Vandeweghe who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Coco Vandeweghe is the pick to win this match.
Coco Vandeweghe -> 1.34
Carol Zhao -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carol Zhao vs. Coco Vandeweghe
This will be the 4th time that Carol Zhao and Coco Vandeweghe fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Vandeweghe (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Vandeweghe won 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in Berlin back in June 2023.
Carol Zhao
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-35 | 17-22 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 26-30 | 14-16 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 32-25 | 18-17 | 10-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 24-19 | 11-9 | 13-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 166, Carol reached the qualifications after defeating Emily Appleton 4-6 7-64 6-4 and Arantxa Rus 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Appleton, The Canadian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-4). During the match, Zhao scored 111 points vs Appleton’s 108. The Canadian was extremely aggressive to blast 57 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zhao struck 6 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Carol Zhao lost the serve 4 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Zhao put 77% of her first serves in, winning 71% (57/80) of the points behind her 1st serve and 29% (7/24) on the 2nd serve. Zhao broke Appleton 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Zhao has winning record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (192-166). 4-3 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zhao has an overall 4-6 match record in the last years on grass.
Zhao’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the W60 Fukuoka.
Zhao has a composed 14-17 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Coco Vandeweghe
8 - 11win/loss
420
9
LLLWWLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8-14 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-18 | 11-7 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-16 | 0-9 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 14-8 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 192, Coco reached the qualifications after beating Su Jeong Jang 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Jeong Jang (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match Vandeweghe scored 90 points vs Jeong Jang’s 88. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Vandeweghe blasted 3 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Coco Vandeweghe lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Vandeweghe put 49% of her first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (22/44) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Jeong Jang 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Vandeweghe has an overall 7-11 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2015 and 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhao | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 49 |
| Pts | 200-189 | 164-153 |
| Total Points | 389 | 317 |
| Winners | 102 | 57 |
| %Winners | 51% | 35% |
Both Zhao and Vandeweghe played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Carol Zhao lost 2 sets, while Coco Vandeweghe conceded 1 set. Zhao has played 1 set more than Vandeweghe (6 vs 5). Therefore, Zhao played 11 games more than Vandeweghe. The Canadian scored 102 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 57 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhao | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 145/186 | 86/163 |
| %1st in | 78% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 102/145 | 57/86 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 15/41 | 42/77 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 55% |
Zhao recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Vandeweghe fired 9 aces (4.5 per match). Zhao won 70% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Vandeweghe won 66% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhao | Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 8 |
| Converted | 8/18 | 8/18 |
| % Converted | 44% | 44% |
| Conceded | 14 | 11 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 57% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
The Canadian broke her opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Zhao conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. Coco broke her opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Coco conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 45% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zhao | |||
| Q1 Appleton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 111-108 | 111-108 | |
| Total points | 219 | 219 | |
| Winners | 57 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 80/104 | 80/104 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 57/80 | 57/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/24 | 7/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Vandeweghe | |||
| Q1 Jeong Jang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 90-88 | 90-88 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/86 | 42/86 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 22/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWWL
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Fernando YamacitaYamacita (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Juan Ignacio IlievIgnacio Iliev (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Geronimo Espin BusleimanEspin Busleiman – Leonardo AboianAboian (6-1 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Nicolas BacellaBacella (6-2 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Alexandre TsuchiyaTsuchiya (4-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carlos Eduardo SeverinoEduardo Severino – Nicolas BianchiBianchi (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Storm SandersSanders – Nao HibinoHibino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BroganBrogan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Sofia KeninKenin (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Kaja JuvanJuvan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
