
Emma Navarro and Rebeka Masarova will play each other in the quarter of the Bad Homburg Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emma Navarro who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emma Navarro is the pick to win this match.
Emma Navarro -> 1.71
Rebeka Masarova -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emma Navarro vs. Rebeka Masarova
There is no head to head record between Emma Navarro and Rebeka Masarova since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emma Navarro
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-25 | 17-14 | 6-6 | 2-1 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-24 | 33-14 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 64-24 | 17-9 | 37-11 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-18 | 8-8 | 23-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-13 | 6-6 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 60 (career-high), the American got to the quarter after beating Nadia Podoroska 6-2 6-0 and Alize Cornet 7-5 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Emma had a good straight sets win against Cornet (7-5 7-66). During the match, Navarro scored 99 points vs Cornet’s 90. Emma was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Navarro scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Emma Navarro lost the serve 3 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Navarro put 67% of her first serves in, winning 54% (38/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 69% (24/35) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Cornet 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Emma hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points she played.
Navarro has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of her matches (120-75). 6-1 on grass in 2023. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Navarro has a compiled6-1 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W25 Naples where she beat Peyton Stearns in the final 6-3 7-5 and the W100 Charleston where she overcame Peyton Stearns in the final 2-6 6-2 7-5 and the W60 Charlottesville where she beat Ashlyn Krueger in the final 6-1 6-1.
Emma has a compiled 35-12 win-loss record in 2023, 6-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bad Homburg
Navarro has never competed in this tournament before.
Rebeka Masarova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-24 | 13-10 | 13-5 | 0-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-29 | 11-14 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-23 | 16-11 | 10-5 | 9-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 8-8 | 21-15 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-13 | 27-7 | 14-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, the Spaniard got to the quarter after defeating Aliaksandra Sasnovich 6-3 6-2 and Bianca Vanessa Andreescu 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Masarova had a good straight sets win against Andreescu (6-3 6-2). During the match Masarova scored 63 points vs Andreescu’s 39. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Masarova recorded 7 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Rebeka Masarova was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 94% (30/32) of her 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Masarova broke Andreescu 3 times after converting 38% of her break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Rebeka hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 62% of the points she played.
Rebeka’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Auckland and the W100 Oeiras.
Rebeka has an aggregate 28-13 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Navarro | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 34 |
| Pts | 157-118 | 122-75 |
| Total Points | 275 | 197 |
| Winners | 59 | 56 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Navarro and Masarova played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Navarro and Masarova have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Navarro played 5 games more than Masarova. Emma scored 59 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Rebeka blasted 56 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Navarro | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 95/142 | 66/92 |
| %1st in | 67% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 59/95 | 56/66 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 32/47 | 13/26 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 50% |
Navarro managed to score 2 aces (1 per match). Masarova scored 11 aces (5.5 per match). Navarro won 62% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Masarova won 85% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Navarro | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 8 |
| Converted | 9/17 | 8/16 |
| % Converted | 53% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 4 |
| Saved | 10 | 2 |
| % Saved | 77% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Emma broke her opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 77% of the break points that she conceded. Rebeka broke her opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Navarro | ||||
| R1 Podoroska |
R2 Cornet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 7-5 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 25 | 39 | |
| pts | 58-28 | 99-90 | 157-118 | |
| Total points | 86 | 189 | 275 | |
| Winners | 21 | 38 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 25/37 | 70/105 | 95/142 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 38/70 | 59/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 54% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 24/35 | 32/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 69% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/8 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 50% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 77% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Masarova | ||||
| R1 Sasnovich |
R2 Andreescu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 34 | |
| pts | 59-36 | 63-39 | 122-75 | |
| Total points | 95 | 102 | 197 | |
| Winners | 26 | 30 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 48% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/48 | 32/44 | 66/92 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 73% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 30/32 | 56/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 94% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 7/12 | 13/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 58% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/8 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 38% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/0 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWLW
LLWLLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Bad Homburg
- Pedro CachinCachin – Jordi Samper-MontanaSamper-Montana (6-3 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Marc GinerGiner (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Axel MichonMichon – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction








