Olivia Gadecki and Ann Li will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 10. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Olivia Gadecki who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Olivia Gadecki is the pick to win this match.
Olivia Gadecki -> 1.87
Ann Li -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Olivia Gadecki vs. Ann Li
There is no head to head record between Olivia Gadecki and Ann Li since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Olivia Gadecki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-18 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-29 | 28-13 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-18 | 20-7 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-22 | 40-17 | 10-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Katrina Scott 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Olivia had a good straight sets win against Scott (6-3 6-4). During the match, Gadecki scored 58 points vs Scott’s 42. Gadecki was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gadecki made 2 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Olivia Gadecki lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gadecki put 65% of her first serves in, winning 78% (28/36) of the points behind her 1st serve and 32% (6/19) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Scott 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Gadecki has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 67% of her matches (126-61). 8-5 on grass in 2023. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gadecki has an aggregate11-9 win-loss record in the last 6 years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the Novo where she beat Arina Rodionova in the final 6-3 6-2.
Gadecki has a composed 32-18 win-loss record in 2023, 8-5 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Ann Li
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-15 | 3-6 | 16-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-28 | 16-13 | 15-9 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-20 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-14 | 19-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-9 | 17-7 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 199, Ann reached the qualifications after defeating Aleksandra Krunic 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Krunic (6-1 6-1). During the match Li scored 60 points vs Krunic’s 35. The American was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Li fired 6 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Ann Li was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (18/24) of her 1st serve and 77% (10/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ann broke Krunic 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Ann’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the W100 Bonita Springs.
The American has an overall 22-16 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gadecki | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 14 |
| Pts | 58-42 | 60-35 |
| Total Points | 100 | 95 |
| Winners | 28 | 18 |
| %Winners | 48% | 30% |
Both Gadecki and Li played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gadecki and Li have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gadecki played 5 games more than Li. The Australian scored 28 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Li struck 18 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gadecki | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 24/37 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 18/24 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 10/13 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 77% |
Gadecki fired 2 aces . Li fired 6 aces . Gadecki won 78% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Li won 75% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 77% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gadecki | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 71% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 40% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Olivia broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Australian lost her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. Ann broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Li was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Gadecki | |||
| Q1 Scott |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 58-42 | 58-42 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 36/55 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 6/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Li | |||
| Q1 Krunic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 60-35 | 60-35 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLWWWWW
LWWWWWLWLW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
