Elizabeth Mandlik and Natalija Stevanovic will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 12. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elizabeth Mandlik who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elizabeth Mandlik is the pick to win this match.
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 1.29
Natalija Stevanovic -> 3.44
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elizabeth Mandlik vs. Natalija Stevanovic
There is no head to head record between Elizabeth Mandlik and Natalija Stevanovic since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elizabeth Mandlik
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-22 | 11-11 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 97 (career-high), Mandlik got to the qualifications after defeating Elsa Jacquemot 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Mandlik had a good straight sets win against Jacquemot (7-5 6-3). During the match, Mandlik scored 72 points vs Jacquemot’s 60. Elizabeth was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mandlik couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Elizabeth Mandlik lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Mandlik put 68% of her first serves in, winning 64% (28/44) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (7/21) on the 2nd serve. Mandlik broke Jacquemot 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Mandlik has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of her matches (124-89). 6-2 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Mandlik has a compiled6-2 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
Elizabeth’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Reus.
Elizabeth has a composed 21-18 win-loss record in 2023, 6-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Elizabeth has never competed in this tournament before.
Natalija Stevanovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-25 | 4-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-12 | 8-6 | 2-4 | 8-4 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-25 | 19-10 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-25 | 9-8 | 3-9 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 223, Kostic got to the qualifications after beating Valentini Grammatikopoulou 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Grammatikopoulou (6-2 6-1). During the match Kostic scored 54 points vs Grammatikopoulou’s 24. Natalija was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about serving, Kostic fired 3 aces and she was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Natalija Stevanovic lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Kostic put 55% of her first serves in, winning 70% (16/23) of the points behind her 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the 2nd serve. Kostic was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Grammatikopoulou 5 times.
Kostic’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W60 Bellinzona.
Natalija has an aggregate 13-15 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mandlik | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 15 |
| Pts | 72-60 | 54-24 |
| Total Points | 132 | 78 |
| Winners | 28 | 16 |
| %Winners | 39% | 30% |
Both Mandlik and Kostic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mandlik and Kostic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mandlik played 6 games more than Kostic. The American scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian struck 16 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mandlik | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 23/42 |
| %1st in | 68% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 28/44 | 16/23 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/21 | 14/19 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 74% |
Mandlik didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kostic bagged 3 aces . Mandlik won 64% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Kostic won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 74% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mandlik | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 5/5 |
| % Converted | 46% | 100% |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 60% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The American broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Natalija broke her opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Kostic conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Mandlik | |||
| Q1 Jacquemot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-60 | 72-60 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/65 | 44/65 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/44 | 28/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/21 | 7/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Kostic | |||
| Q1 Grammatikopoulou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-24 | 54-24 | |
| Total points | 78 | 78 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWLW
LLWLLLLLWL Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
