Elina Avanesyan and Storm Hunter will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 10. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elina Avanesyan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elina Avanesyan is the pick to win this match.
Elina Avanesyan -> 1.56
Storm Hunter -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elina Avanesyan vs. Storm Hunter
There is no head to head record between Elina Avanesyan and Storm Hunter since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Elina Avanesyan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-24 | 12-13 | 11-7 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-24 | 7-12 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-26 | 11-7 | 25-17 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 48-19 | 0-0 | 48-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-8 | 4-2 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 64 (career-high), Elina reached the qualifications after beating Fernanda Contreras Gomez 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Contreras Gomez (6-3 6-0). During the match, Avanesyan scored 64 points vs Contreras Gomez’s 39. Elina was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Avanesyan was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 2 double faults. Elina Avanesyan lost the serve once. Furthermore, Avanesyan put 71% of her first serves in, winning 79% (27/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. Elina broke Contreras Gomez 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Avanesyan has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 65% of her matches (146-80). 4-2 on grass in 2023. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Avanesyan has an overall4-3 record in the last 6 years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W100 Wiesbaden where she beat Jaimee Fourlis in the final 6-2 6-0.
Avanesyan has an overall 25-15 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
Storm Hunter
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-5 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-19 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-15 | 10-7 | 11-5 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-7 | 6-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162, Sanders got to the qualifications after beating Mingge Xu 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Sanders had a good straight sets win against Xu (7-5 6-4). During the match Sanders scored 91 points vs Xu’s 78. Sanders was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Sanders scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Storm Hunter lost the serve twice and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Sanders put 64% of her first serves in, winning 58% (33/57) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (20/32) on the 2nd serve. Storm broke Xu 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W60 Burnie where she overcame Olivia Gadecki in the final 6-4 6-3.
The Australian has a composed 18-7 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Avanesyan | Sanders |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 15 | 22 |
Pts | 64-39 | 91-78 |
Total Points | 103 | 169 |
Winners | 27 | 33 |
%Winners | 42% | 36% |
Both Avanesyan and Sanders played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Avanesyan and Sanders have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Avanesyan played 7 games less than Sanders. Avanesyan scored 27 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Storm bagged 33 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Avanesyan | Sanders |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
1st in | 34/48 | 57/89 |
%1st in | 71% | 64% |
1st pts | 27/34 | 33/57 |
%1st pts | 79% | 58% |
2nd pts | 6/14 | 20/32 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 63% |
Avanesyan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sanders struck 1 ace . Avanesyan won 79% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Sanders won 58% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Avanesyan | Sanders |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/10 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 50% | 40% |
Conceded | 1 | 10 |
Saved | 0 | 8 |
% Saved | 0% | 80% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Avanesyan broke her opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Avanesyan dropped her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Sanders conceded her serve twice and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
Avanesyan | |||
Q1 Contreras Gomez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 64-39 | 64-39 | |
Total points | 103 | 103 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Sanders | |||
Q1 Xu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 91-78 | 91-78 | |
Total points | 169 | 169 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 57/89 | 57/89 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 33/57 | 33/57 | |
% 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
2nd pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction