Ashlyn Krueger and Celine Naef will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ashlyn Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ashlyn Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Ashlyn Krueger -> 1.48
Celine Naef -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ashlyn Krueger vs. Celine Naef
There is no head to head record between Ashlyn Krueger and Celine Naef since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Ashlyn Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-18 | 7-9 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 10-11 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 108 (career-high), Krueger got to the qualifications after defeating Alice Robbe 6-4 3-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Robbe (6-4 3-6 6-1). During the match, Krueger scored 98 points vs Robbe’s 82. Ashlyn was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the encounter and she committed only 2 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 63% of her first serves in, winning 66% (33/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. Ashlyn broke Robbe 5 times after converting 28% of her break points (5/18).
Krueger has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of her matches (93-65). 8-2 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has a compiled8-2 win-loss record in the last 5 years on grass.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the Gaiba where she defeated Tatjana Maria in the final 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Ashlyn has an overall 30-16 win-loss record in 2023, 8-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Ashlyn has never competed in this tournament before.
Celine Naef
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-18 | 3-2 | 3-4 | 10-7 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 165 (career-high), the Swiss got to the qualifications after defeating Kristina Dmitruk 7-63 6-0.
In the qualifications, Naef had a good straight sets win against Dmitruk (7-63 6-0). During the match Naef scored 68 points vs Dmitruk’s 48. The Swiss was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Naef blasted 4 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Celine Naef lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Naef put 65% of her first serves in, winning 74% (31/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Naef broke Dmitruk 4 times after converting 80% of her break points (4/5).
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W25 Loughborough where she defeated Eliz Maloney in the final 6-0 6-4 and the W40 Porto where she defeated Lucrezia Stefanini in the final 6-2 6-4.
The Swiss has a compiled 31-8 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 19 |
| Pts | 98-82 | 68-48 |
| Total Points | 180 | 116 |
| Winners | 33 | 31 |
| %Winners | 34% | 46% |
Both Krueger and Naef played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ashlyn Krueger lost 1 set while Celine Naef hasn’t lost a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set more than Naef (3 vs 2). Therefore, Krueger played 7 games more than Naef. Ashlyn scored 33 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Celine managed to score 31 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 50/79 | 42/65 |
| %1st in | 63% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 31/42 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 43% |
Krueger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Naef blasted 4 aces . Krueger won 66% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Naef won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/18 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 28% | 80% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 40% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 28% conversion rate. Krueger surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. The Swiss broke her opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Naef conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Robbe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 98-82 | 98-82 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 50/79 | 50/79 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/18 | 5/18 | |
| Converted % | 28% | 28% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Naef | |||
| Q1 Dmitruk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-48 | 68-48 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 42/65 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 31/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWLLW
LLLWLLLLLW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
