Nao Hibino and Reka-Luca Jani will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on Court 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nao Hibino who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nao Hibino is the pick to win this match.
Nao Hibino -> 1.099
Reka-Luca Jani -> 6.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nao Hibino vs. Reka-Luca Jani
This will be the 3rd time that Nao Hibino and Reka-Luca Jani play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Hibino and Jani (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Jani won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in the W100 Versmold back in 2022.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-10 | 9-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 125, Hibino reached the qualifications after defeating Anastasia Zakharova 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Zakharova (6-4 6-3). During the match, Hibino scored 68 points vs Zakharova’s 57. Nao was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hibino fired 3 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Nao Hibino lost the serve once and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 62% of her first serves in, winning 77% (30/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Nao broke Zakharova 3 times after converting 60% of her break points (3/5).
Hibino has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of her matches (295-243). 3-1 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Hibino has a composed 21-19 match record in the last years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W25 Kashiwa where she beat Su Jeong Jang in the final 6-4 6-3.
Nao has an overall 27-17 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Reka-Luca Jani
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-40 | 1-7 | 16-31 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-35 | 3-8 | 51-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-29 | 8-8 | 26-17 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-16 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 155, Reka-Luca reached the qualifications after beating Hannah Klugman 6-1 7-66.
In the qualifications, Reka-Luca had a good straight sets win against Klugman (6-1 7-66). During the match Jani scored 74 points vs Klugman’s 65. Reka-Luca was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Jani wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Reka-Luca Jani lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jani put 72% of her first serves in, winning 61% (33/54) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Jani broke Klugman 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Jani’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the W25 Feld am See.
Jani has a compiled 12-23 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hibino | Jani |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 68-57 | 74-65 |
| Total Points | 125 | 139 |
| Winners | 30 | 33 |
| %Winners | 44% | 45% |
Both Hibino and Jani played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hibino and Jani have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hibino played 1 game less than Jani. The Japanese scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Reka-Luca bagged 33 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hibino | Jani |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 54/75 |
| %1st in | 62% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 33/54 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 9/21 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 43% |
Hibino managed to score 3 aces . Jani didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Hibino won 77% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Jani won 61% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hibino | Jani |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 56% |
| Conceded | 9 | 8 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 89% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Nao broke her opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Nao conceded her serve once and she saved 89% of the break points that she conceded. The Hungarian broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Reka-Luca conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded.
| Hibino | |||
| Q1 Zakharova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-57 | 68-57 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jani | |||
| Q1 Klugman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-65 | 74-65 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 54/75 | 54/75 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 33/54 | 33/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLWWL
LLLWLLL Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
