Patrick Kypson and Gonzalo Lama will square off in the 2nd round of the Medellin Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CANCHA ESTADIO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.4
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Gonzalo Lama
This will be the 2nd time that Patrick Kypson and Gonzalo Lama face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lama (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Lama won 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Mosquera back in March 2023.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-13 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 330, Patrick got to the 2nd round after beating Matias Franco Descotte 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kypson had a good straight sets win against Franco Descotte (6-4 6-3). During the match, Kypson scored 69 points vs Franco Descotte’s 58. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kypson recorded 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Patrick Kypson was quite effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kypson broke Franco Descotte twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Kypson has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (156-88). 13-6 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kypson has a compiled83-37 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the San Luis Potosi Challenger and the Savannah Challenger.
Patrick has an overall 17-11 win-loss record in 2023, 13-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Medellin Challenger
Kypson has never competed in this tournament before.
Gonzalo Lama
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-29 | 3-4 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-29 | 0-0 | 39-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-19 | 0-1 | 49-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 427, Lama reached the 2nd round after beating Alex Barrena 6-73 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Barrena, The Chilean recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-4). During the match Lama scored 107 points vs Barrena’s 103. Lama was exceptionally aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Lama fired 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Gonzalo Lama lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lama put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (47/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (20/42) on the 2nd serve. The Chilean broke Barrena 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Gonzalo has a compiled 7-16 win-loss record in 2023, 7-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 33 |
| Pts | 69-58 | 107-103 |
| Total Points | 127 | 210 |
| Winners | 24 | 47 |
| %Winners | 35% | 44% |
Both Kypson and Lama played 1 match. At the moment, Gonzalo Lama dropped 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kypson has played 1 set(s) less than Lama (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kypson played 14 games less than Lama. The American scored 24 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Chilean recorded 47 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 2 |
| 1st in | 32/64 | 67/109 |
| %1st in | 50% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 47/67 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 20/42 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 48% |
Kypson fired 8 aces . Lama bagged 2 aces . Kypson won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Lama won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 29% | 42% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Kypson broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The American very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. Lama broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Chilean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | |||
| R1 Franco Descotte |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-58 | 69-58 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 32/64 | 32/64 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 19/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lama | |||
| R1 Barrena |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 107-103 | 107-103 | |
| Total points | 210 | 210 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 67/109 | 67/109 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 47/67 | 47/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/42 | 20/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLLW
L Tennis Scores in Medellin Challenger
- Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-73 6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Orlando LuzLuz – Johan Alexander RodriguezAlexander Rodriguez (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Calum PuttergillPuttergill – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Felipe SantamariaSantamaria (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (7-65 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Aidan MayoMayo (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-73 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Jose StathamStatham (1-6 6-4 7-60) – See score progression
- Jorge Brian Panta HerrerosBrian Panta Herreros – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Calum PuttergillPuttergill – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Aidan MayoMayo (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benjamin LockLock – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jorge Brian Panta HerrerosBrian Panta Herreros – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Orlando LuzLuz – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Tristan MccormickMccormick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
