Emilio Nava and Daniel Michalski will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Modena Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Michalski who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Michalski -> 1.77
Emilio Nava -> 1.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Daniel Michalski
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Daniel Michalski since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-28 | 8-7 | 45-19 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 210, Emilio got to the 2nd round after beating Elmar Ejupovic 6-75 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Ejupovic, Nava recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-3). During the match, Nava scored 103 points vs Ejupovic’s 88. Emilio was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nava managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 63% (20/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emilio broke Ejupovic 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Nava has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (129-87). 8-8 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nava has an overall57-28 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
The American has an aggregate 16-18 win-loss record in 2023, 8-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Modena Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Michalski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-30 | 5-3 | 47-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271, the Pole got to the 2nd round after beating Alibek Kachmazov 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, Michalski had a good straight sets win against Kachmazov (6-4 6-0). During the match Michalski scored 67 points vs Kachmazov’s 43. Daniel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Michalski fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Michalski was extremely effective on serve to win 87% (26/30) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel broke Kachmazov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Michalski’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Daniel has an overall 25-14 win-loss record in 2023, 21-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 16 |
| Pts | 103-88 | 67-43 |
| Total Points | 191 | 110 |
| Winners | 43 | 26 |
| %Winners | 42% | 39% |
Both Nava and Michalski played 1 match. At the moment, Emilio Nava lost 1 set while Daniel Michalski hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nava has played 1 set more than Michalski (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nava played 16 games more than Michalski. The American scored 43 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Michalski scored 26 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 6 |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 30/49 |
| %1st in | 62% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 43/53 | 26/30 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 63% |
Nava blasted 12 aces . Michalski managed to score 6 aces . Nava won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Michalski won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 36% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Nava surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Pole broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Michalski was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Nava | |||
| R1 Ejupovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 103-88 | 103-88 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 53/85 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 43/53 | 43/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Michalski | |||
| R1 Kachmazov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-43 | 67-43 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/49 | 30/49 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Modena Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (6-4 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-72 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesco FortiForti – Marcello SerafiniSerafini (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Gianluca MagerMager (7-610 6-3) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Lucas GerchGerch (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Gilles Arnaud BaillyArnaud Bailly (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Giovanni FonioFonio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (7-64 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gianmarco FerrariFerrari – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-74 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Max HoukesHoukes (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jakub MensikMensik (5-7 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Lucas GerchGerch (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction