Madison Keys and Xiyu Wang will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Madison Keys who should win in 2 sets.
Madison Keys -> 1.35
Xiyu Wang -> 3.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Madison Keys vs. Xiyu Wang
There is no head to head record between Madison Keys and Xiyu Wang since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Madison Keys
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-15 | 24-6 | 9-4 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-12 | 7-6 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-15 | 19-9 | 5-3 | 0-2 | 9-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-20 | 25-12 | 4-4 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-15 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 25, Madison reached the 2nd round after defeating Tereza Martincova 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Martincova (7-64 6-4). During the match, Keys scored 78 points vs Martincova’s 69. Madison was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Keys made 9 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Madison Keys lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Keys put 62% of her first serves in, winning 74% (34/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Martincova 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Keys has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of her matches (249-145). 1-0 on grass in 2023. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Keys has a composed 31-11 record in the last years on grass.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title in Australia where she beat Lucia Bronzetti in the final 6-3 6-2.
Madison has an overall 17-8 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Xiyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-18 | 17-11 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-30 | 18-19 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 17-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 15-10 | 23-11 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-19 | 8-7 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 73, Xiyu got to the 2nd round after beating Dalma Galfi 6-1 1-0 ret., Linda Fruhvirtova 6-4 6-2 and Rebecca Marino 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Wang had a good straight sets win against Marino (6-4 6-2). During the match Wang scored 55 points vs Marino’s 34. Wang was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Wang bagged 3 aces and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Xiyu Wang was quite effective on serve to win 78% (28/36) of her 1st serve and 56% (5/9) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Wang broke Marino 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
The Chinese has an overall 13-13 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on grass (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in Eastbourne
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Keys | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 44 |
| Pts | 78-69 | 157-104 |
| Total Points | 147 | 261 |
| Winners | 34 | 78 |
| %Winners | 44% | 50% |
Keys played 1 match while Wang competed in 3 matches. Wang started her run from the qualifications while Keys had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Keys has played 5 set(s) less than Wang (2 vs 7). Therefore, Keys played 21 games less than Wang. Madison scored 34 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese blasted 78 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Keys | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 46/74 | 101/134 |
| %1st in | 62% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 78/101 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 15/33 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 45% |
Keys fired 9 aces . Wang made 10 aces (3.3 per match). Keys won 74% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Wang won 77% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Keys | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 11/20 |
| % Converted | 44% | 55% |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 57% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Keys broke her opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Madison lost her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. The Chinese broke her opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve twice and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
| Keys | |||
| R1 Martincova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 78-69 | 78-69 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/74 | 46/74 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Wang | |||||
| Q1 Galfi | Q3 Fruhvirtova | R1 Marino | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 1-0 ret. | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 8 | 18 | 18 | 44 | |
| pts | 31-13 | 71-57 | 55-34 | 157-104 | |
| Total points | 44 | 128 | 89 | 261 | |
| Winners | 13 | 37 | 28 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 52% | 51% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 15/21 | 50/68 | 36/45 | 101/134 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 74% | 80% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 13/15 | 37/50 | 28/36 | 78/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 74% | 78% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/6 | 7/18 | 5/9 | 15/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 39% | 56% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/7 | 5/8 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 43% | 63% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/6 | 2/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Fred SimonssonSimonsson – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico GaioGaio – Gibril DiarraDiarra (7-5 6-75 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Filippo MoraMora (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pietro RondoniRondoni – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jacopo StefaniniStefanini (6-3 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Xiyu WangWang – Madison KeysKeys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Cori GauffGauff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Ons JabeurJabeur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Caroline GarciaGarcia (0-3) – H2H and prediction