Bianca Vanessa Andreescu and Rebeka Masarova will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Bad Homburg Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 6:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bianca Vanessa Andreescu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bianca Vanessa Andreescu is the pick to win this match.
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu -> 1.49
Rebeka Masarova -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bianca Vanessa Andreescu vs. Rebeka Masarova
There is no head to head record between Bianca Vanessa Andreescu and Rebeka Masarova since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 15-16 | 9-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 20-13 | 7-5 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-12 | 14-8 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 51, Bianca got to the 2nd round after defeating Sonay Kartal 6-2 3-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Andreescu defeated Kartal (6-2 3-6 7-5). During the match, Andreescu scored 105 points vs Kartal’s 101. Bianca was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Andreescu managed to score 7 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Bianca Vanessa Andreescu lost the serve twice and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Andreescu put 64% of her first serves in, winning 64% (39/61) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (22/35) on the 2nd serve. Andreescu broke Kartal 4 times after converting 27% of her break points (4/15).
Andreescu has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 69% of her matches (188-86). 2-2 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Andreescu has an overall20-13 record in the last 7 years on grass.
The Canadian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Hua Hin.
Andreescu has an overall 13-12 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bad Homburg
Rebeka Masarova
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 16-17 | 6-8 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-23 | 16-11 | 10-5 | 9-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-26 | 8-8 | 21-15 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 42-13 | 27-7 | 14-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, Masarova got to the 2nd round after beating Aliaksandra Sasnovich 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Masarova had a good straight sets win against Sasnovich (6-3 6-2). During the match Masarova scored 59 points vs Sasnovich’s 36. The Spaniard was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Masarova bagged 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Rebeka Masarova lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Masarova put 71% of her first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Sasnovich 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
The Spaniard’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Auckland and the W100 Oeiras.
Rebeka has a compiled 27-13 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bad Homburg
Rebeka has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Andreescu | Masarova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 29 | 17 |
Pts | 105-101 | 59-36 |
Total Points | 206 | 95 |
Winners | 39 | 26 |
%Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Andreescu and Masarova played 1 match. At the moment, Bianca Vanessa Andreescu surrendered 1 set while Rebeka Masarova hasn’t conceded a set so far. Andreescu has played 1 set more than Masarova (3 vs 2). Therefore, Andreescu played 12 games more than Masarova. Bianca scored 39 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard struck 26 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Andreescu | Masarova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 4 |
Avg per match | 7 | 4 |
1st in | 61/96 | 34/48 |
%1st in | 64% | 71% |
1st pts | 39/61 | 26/34 |
%1st pts | 64% | 76% |
2nd pts | 22/35 | 6/14 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 43% |
Andreescu struck 7 aces . Masarova struck 4 aces . Andreescu won 64% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Masarova won 76% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Andreescu | Masarova |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/15 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 27% | 63% |
Conceded | 10 | 4 |
Saved | 8 | 2 |
% Saved | 80% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Andreescu broke her opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. The Canadian dropped her serve twice and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded. Rebeka broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Rebeka conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Andreescu | |||
R1 Kartal |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 105-101 | 105-101 | |
Total points | 206 | 206 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 61/96 | 61/96 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 39/61 | 39/61 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 22/35 | 22/35 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Masarova | |||
R1 Sasnovich |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 59-36 | 59-36 | |
Total points | 95 | 95 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Bad Homburg
- Daniel Munoz-De La NavaMunoz-De La Nava – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Jaime Fermosell DelgadoFermosell Delgado (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Sergio Gutierrez-FerrolGutierrez-Ferrol (7-63 4-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jordi Samper-MontanaSamper-Montana – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro CachinCachin – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc GinerGiner – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Axel MichonMichon – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Evgeniya RodinaRodina (1-0) – H2H and prediction