Luca Van Assche and Borna Gojo will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 4:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.77
Luca Van Assche -> 1.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luca Van Assche vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Luca Van Assche and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Luca Van Assche
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-26 | 7-4 | 15-12 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-38 | 15-15 | 8-10 | 10-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 1-7 | 15-11 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-31 | 0-1 | 40-20 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-22 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 75, Luca reached the qualifications after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (6-4 6-0). During the match, Van Assche scored 61 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 39. Luca was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van Assche scored 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Luca Van Assche lost the serve once. Furthermore, Van Assche put 60% of his first serves in, winning 89% (25/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (6/19) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Kumar Mukund 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Van Assche has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 60% of his matches (109-73). 1-1 on grass in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van Assche has an overall1-1 match record in the last 4 years on grass.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Pau Challenger where he defeated Ugo Humbert in the final 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(6) and the Sanremo Challenger where he overcame Juan Pablo Varillas in the final 6-1 6-3.
Van Assche has an aggregate 21-16 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Luca has never competed in this tournament before.
Borna Gojo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-18 | 4-6 | 12-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 111, Gojo reached the qualifications after beating Viktor Durasovic 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gojo had a good straight sets win against Durasovic (6-4 6-3). During the match Gojo scored 60 points vs Durasovic’s 40. The Croatian was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Gojo blasted 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Borna Gojo was very effective on serve to win 94% (32/34) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Borna broke Durasovic twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Gojo’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Monterrey Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
Borna has an aggregate 30-16 win-loss record in 2023, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van Assche | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 |
| Pts | 61-39 | 60-40 |
| Total Points | 100 | 100 |
| Winners | 25 | 32 |
| %Winners | 41% | 53% |
Both Van Assche and Gojo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van Assche and Gojo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van Assche played 3 games less than Gojo. Van Assche scored 25 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Borna made 32 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van Assche | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 11 |
| 1st in | 28/47 | 34/48 |
| %1st in | 60% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 32/34 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 94% |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 8/14 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 57% |
Van Assche fired 7 aces . Gojo bagged 11 aces . Van Assche won 89% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 94% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van Assche | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Van Assche dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Gojo was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Van Assche | |||
| Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/47 | 28/47 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 6/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gojo | |||
| Q1 Durasovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 60-40 | 60-40 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 32/34 | 32/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWWW
LLWLWLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Maxime CressyCressy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Sebastian BaezBaez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Yibing WuWu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael YmerYmer – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
